Attraction Theory Essay

1278 Words3 Pages

Attraction Theory Attraction theory essentially posits that people are more likely to be attracted to those who have similarities to themselves, on the other hand, there are some who attract the opposite personality to theirs. Key concepts of this theory are that it is typified by various characteristics that a person has, as well as components of their personality and overall being. They may have similarities such as” hones/ethical” or their appearance is attractive to the person. (DeVito 2016) Another, is personality traits as self-esteem, shyness and optimism are likely to be shared and exhibited between people who have some form of relationship between them. The central strength of this theory is that it is people often prefer sharing …show more content…

As an illustration, tension in relationship can result from having money problems, seems to be the biggest problem for couples. As a result, there seems to be a lot of fighting going on in the relationship. Another, problem may be in the relationship, there is one or both partners re interested in someone else (coldness or openness) or one may be seeing someone, which cause confusion and arguing among themselves (DeVito 2016). Therefore, the theory posits that relationships can succumb to pressures that are often associated with maintaining connections and relationships, and the communication patterns can be affected by these forms of instability. (DeVito 2016) Equally important, patterns in communication that create a constant state of imbalance acts in such a way that it is adverse to cultivating and sustaining developed relationships. There are four principle concepts that are associated with this theory: opposing needs and desire, connection with others, autonomy and independence. (DeVito 2016 Pg. 236). One of the most prominent strengths of this theory is the practicality that is associated with rebalance of your life. It provides a sense of stability in relationships when someone utilizes the theory correctly. Communication strategies are taught in this theory which is great. For example, the principle issues is that it assumes that …show more content…

As such, communication forms move from shallow, relatively non-intimate levels to those that are more intimate and deeply personal (DeVito 2016). In short, it has infiltrated the very interior of the individual’s personality in such an intensified way. . The theory supports the idea that relationships get deeper as communication begins to increase, but the stages themselves aren 't clearly defined and the criteria which constitutes each stage is also vague in many ways. Another, principle strengths in this theory is that it allows the platform for understanding and showing progress in relationships, but on the other hand, it can make a sudden change in direction. As a result, the relationship then heads toward deteriorate path. It goes in another direction of depenetration, which seems to be the beginning of the end of the relationship. However, the stages that are associated with this theory present an interesting take on how relationships develop, and how suddenly they can end. Therefore, I thought the weakness was that this theory had interesting facts about it, but the deeper the relationship got the faster it was over. Not to mention once the relationship was over the couple could now talk about their problems, but could not bring themselves to do it while being together, which was a little confusing. In

Open Document