Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Principles of art design essay
Starry night line analysis
Principles of art design essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Principles of art design essay
Now, going to the principles of design process of the art work he used empahsis really well becasue he let the stars of the art work take over the whole thing to draw the eye srtaight to the sky. Along with repetition the art work in the sky continues the same patterns with the way the line match and never stop with the wind and all of the stars are created the same way. The whole painting just kind of has a flow to it. The movemnt part of the art seems off to me becasue i see a huge strucutre in the middle of the painting covering most of the bottom left corner, but i truly cant make out what it is but i feel as if its a flame from something pervious burning. The contrast and the variety of Starry Night is well used because the art work is
Wayne, transforms this painting into a three dimensional abstract piece of art. The focal point of the painting are the figures that look like letters and numbers that are in the front of the piece of art. This is where your eyes expend more time, also sometimes forgiving the background. The way the artist is trying to present this piece is showing happiness, excitement, and dreams. Happiness because he transmits with the bright colours. After probably 15 minutes on front of the painting I can feel that the artist tries to show his happiness, but in serene calm. The excitement that he presents with the letters, numbers and figures is a signal that he feels anxious about what the future is going to bring. Also in the way that the colors in the background are present he is showing that no matter how dark our day can be always will be light to
Surprisingly small compared to other works, “Astronomer by Candlelight” by Gerrit Dou could be easily overlooked by a casual stroller. However, as I approached it to have a closer look, other paintings quickly lost interest for me. The closer I got, the more detail appeared; the scene came alive with the play of light and dark. The astronomer, eternally still, pulsed with life, pondering over his books. Within a foot of the painting I began to feel as though I was looking through a keyhole into his study. Indeed, Dou's work and all its facets becomes an emblem for "the inquiry of truth, which is the lovemaking, or the wooing of it... [as] the sovereign good of human nature" as eloquently stated by Francis Bacon in "Of Truth." Made in the 1950's, the painting stands as a prominent example of Gerrit Dou's technique.
The visual devices used were concentric circles and rectangular buildings I stated the visual art elements were intertwined with the principles of design. The tall rectangular shapes portrayed skyscraper towers in New York City. Industry was portrayed through the smoke and the man with the suitcase stepping up the cog wheel. I saw a man figure in the middle playing a saxophone and assumed he was the subject matter. There was a use of gestural lines to create form of a 3-D effect with the buildings, as well as the smoke floating in the air, the people figures, the shadows, and the wheel of life. There were uses with the secondary hue green, which has value starting with a light green by the statue of liberty in the concentric circles darkening with each circle. The green cool color with a use of a neural color of brown for the buildings was how the picture was portrayed. Great space was used for overlapping objects, like the people and buildings. The buildings had a two-point perspective due to the angles they are pointing at. Symmetrical balance was achieved with the use of colors, line, and shapes (to take up space). There was a sense of movement with the man holding the briefcase, which looked like he was walking up stairs. Unity and Variety were accomplished using the use of color, shape, line, etc. The painting is
... study for the overall concept they appear rather as abstract patterns. The shadows of the figures were very carefully modeled. The light- dark contrasts of the shadows make them seem actually real. The spatial quality is only established through the relations between the sizes of the objects. The painting is not based on a geometrical, box like space. The perspective centre is on the right, despite the fact that the composition is laid in rows parallel to the picture frame. At the same time a paradoxical foreshortening from right to left is evident. The girl fishing with the orange dress and her mother are on the same level, that is, actually at equal distance. In its spatial contruction, the painting is also a successful construction, the groups of people sitting in the shade, and who should really be seen from above, are all shown directly from the side. The ideal eye level would actually be on different horizontal lines; first at head height of the standing figures, then of those seated. Seurats methods of combing observations which he collected over two years, corresponds, in its self invented techniques, to a modern lifelike painting rather than an academic history painting.
An artwork will consist of different elements that artists bring together to create different forms of art from paintings, sculptures, movies and more. These elements make up what a viewer sees and to help them understand. In the painting Twilight in the Wilderness created by Frederic Edwin Church in 1860 on page 106, a landscape depicting a sun setting behind rows of mountains is seen. In this painting, Church used specific elements to draw the viewer’s attention directly to the middle of the painting that consisted of the sun. Church primarily uses contrast to attract attention, but it is the different aspects of contrast that he uses that makes the painting come together. In Twilight in the Wilderness, Church uses color, rhythm, and focal
The main thing that stands out in this painting is the uneven weight of the painting. The weight of the painting is in bottom of the painting in a semicircle. The uneven balance, of weight, makes it impossible for the painting to have symmetry. Which further adds to the sense of doom and hopelessness of the crash. Symmetry makes a painting appear unified and organized. Like a landscape painting were the balanced weight of the painting, and clear symmetry adds a calming effect and allows you to take in the whole scene.This piece uses the exact opposite approach of symmetry, and balance of weight, to create a disorganized chaotic piece. About doom and hopelessness in the face of this tragedy,
The Storm, created in 1880, is his only painting to have received praise from the world of art. To showcase another masterpiece completed by Cot, I chose to compare and contrast the composition of Le Printemps . This was also created in the same era and was influenced by images fabricated from the real world. The composition of this painting is quite complete; it includes actual lines, organic shapes, and the illusion of light.
Let me first start off by saying this is a beautiful piece! It amazes me how the artist, Carl Rice Embrey, incorporated different painting styles and techniques into this painting. he simply did not just paint two chairs in kitchen but put a lot of thought into his work. I do understand and see where people compare his work to other artist such as Andrew Wyeth. They both have the same idea when it comes to painting landscapes although, there is a big difference. Carl paints landscape more scenic, and realistic whereas Andrew’s looks more animated. Carl’s work is also compared to Franz Kline. Even though it is two totally opposite paintings Carl adopted the style that Franz uses in his paintings to the shadows of the chairs
...technique of fluid in the brush strokes, which lead to an impression of blurry. The spots of soft color combine with the color of the figures, which shows bright light of beams through the trees. He blends colors in the background that appear to be people dancing. The lack of outlines is a traditional Impressionist technique.
-How does the piece reflect the time period in which it was created? Is it part of particular movement in art history? If so, which one? Does it reflect a cultural or religious idea? Explain.
A.E Housman, Vincent Van Gogh, and Walt Whitman are all artists who have composed works of stars and the night sky. Their pieces are labeled “Stars, I Have Seen Them Fall”, Starry Night, and “When I Heard the Learn’d Astronomer”. There may be similarities and differences in the pieces, but they all revolve around the same message and theme of stars. The three artists somehow connect through these works but also affect the audience differently.
... into deeper indigos and grays. The dramatic contrasts in light and tone aid in the formation of space without causing too much motion in the scene. The strong lines throughout give the images more conceptual meaning. The mountains are tangible and solid, clearly separated from both the ground and the deep blue sky. The light dramatizes both the depth and clarity in the painting.
I was quite impressed with how Clark made the different colors fit and how it eventually turned into a great piece. The painting does a great job with communicating its subject matter. I believe that Ed Clark did not have a specific goal for creating this artwork in fact he says that he never knows what his painting will turn out to be nor will he be able to understand it. "I'm still trying to paint that painting...I'm never satisfied with my paintings - but I'm less satisfied with everybody else. I believe Clark was trying to give a cool, warm, and vivid expression. I definitely agree that this work succeeded in expressing the intent of the artist.
Eugene O’Neill’s play, Long Day’s Journey Into Night is not morbid, full of despair and hopelessness or unpleasant. James, Mary, Jamie, and Edmund Tyrone all had the opportunity to change their ways. The Tyrone family had opportunities of redemption to help each other and help themselves but they chose to not to take them, even though they all loved each other they couldn't help one another as much as they needed but the opportunity of hope was still present.
It was produced using silk screen technique. This in turn created an almost “mass produced” appeal to the piece. Many critics of this painting point out that the piece is cold, sterile, and expressionless However, at closer look, it is evident that Warhol paid a great attention to each canvass. While each canvass seems as if they were simply reproduced mechanically, it is crucial to point that Warhol in fact, sought such technique to systematically recreate imperfection. A closer look at the canvasses will reveal a slight variation and inconsistency. This again is done in order to properly convey his message of banality. Alternately, a closer examination of the piece shows although it was created using mechanical equipment, that the details appear almost handmade. It displays aggressive traits of enlargement, bright colors, and isolation which are known characteristics of pop. This shows how the artist is reasserting his own feelings, emotions, and creativity (Moorhead