Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Greek mythology relationships
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Greek mythology relationships
I’m going to give you my view on Aristophanes, Socrates, and my account of love. Aristophanes speech on “What is Love,” in the Symposium was very interesting. I say this, because back then humans were more powerful, and knowledgeable than we’re today. Nowadays there’re a lot of things that we can’t prove about the past, simply because we don’t have any evidence or proof. Aristophanes says, “Humans once had four legs, four arms, two heads, and so on.” So us humans, were combined with our significant other, or soulmate, and we were split apart, because the gods feared we might challenge them one day. Aristophanes ends his speech by explaining, the time we spend looking for our other half, is what we call love. Aristophanes account of love can …show more content…
Even if the parents were to depart from each other, both of them are still going to love the child. As you see nowadays, most parents are in court, trying to get custody of their kids. It’s like a child ties invisible chains to the father, and mother. If you have a child by someone why wouldn’t you want to be with that person, this is a sign that you can experience love at a deeper level. The way Diotima described love to Socrates is different from my point of view. To me, you experience love when you can maintain a stable relationship. If things are not mutual between two people, then that’s not love. One person shouldn’t feel like they love the other person more, both should feel this way. To obtain love you need trust, good communication, and pleasure. Without trust, you’ll always be overthinking. Eventually you’ll end up hurting yourself from all of the thoughts. Then, it’ll seem like the other person is slowly detaching from your life. Communication is the second most important thing. Without communication, your relationship will fail, because if you don’t talk to the one you love, you’ll be stressed. Having a hard time keeping a conversation going is bad
The poetry of Sappho, and the speeches in Plato’s Symposium both deal primarily with homoerotic love, although Sappho, one of the only female poets in Ancient Greece, speaks from the female perspective, while Plato’s work focuses on the nature of this love between men. There are several fundamental elements that are common to both perspectives, including similar ideals of youth and beauty, and the idea of desire as integral to both views on love. Despite these similarities, however, there is an important distinction, which can be understood in terms of Pausanias’ concepts of Common versus Celestial Love, where Sappho’s view represents Common Love, and the larger view of Symposium represents Celestial Love. While Sappho’s work is very much grounded in the physical realm, Plato emphasizes that true love is centralized in the mind, and that it is an intellectual and philosophical phenomenon.
to open another vein of discourse; he had a mind to praise Love in another way, unlike
‘So if Love is lacking in attractive qualities, and if good things are attractive, then Love lacks good qualities too.’ ” (Plato 40-41)
In the Symposium, a most interesting view on love and soul mates are provided by one of the characters, Aristophanes. In the speech of Aristophanes, he says that there is basically a type of love that connects people. Aristophanes begins his description of love by telling the tale of how love began. He presents the tale of three sexes: male, female, and a combination of both. These three distinct sexes represented one’s soul. These souls split in half, creating a mirror image of each one of them. Aristophanes describes love as the search for the other half of your soul in this quote: “When a man’s natural form was split in two, each half went round looking for its other half. They put their arms around one another, and embraced each other, in their desire to grow together again. Aristophanes theme is the power of Eros and how not to abuse it.
Aristophanes attributes love as a punishment from the gods, whereas Aristotle classifies it was one’s desire. Aristophanes believed that we we’re once whole, before our souls were split in halves because of the threat humans faced to the gods. The God’s weakened because of the powers love possess, and we exist as halves. Through the journey of love we seek to unite with our other half and empower ourselves once again to return to our original human state. Aristophanes perceives erotic love as having someone to go through the process of life with. The objective of life would be to life one’s soulmate for the fulfillment of one’s life. He emphasizes that without love, one’s life cannot be complete because it’s everlasting and unifying. We seek the feeling and experiences associated with love, more than the sexual pleasures because of what we’re missing externally. On the other side of the fence, Greek Philosopher Aristotle describes erotic love as one’s desires or simply Eros. What governs who we should love is should be guided by reason as opposed to desires. He perceives erotic love existing beyond one’s projected image, because of the problems associated with people resembling each other. If you love person A because she has
Socrates’ speech does that. It contains the sides mentioned before, and uniquely views Love from a dynamic perspective. Phaedrus Phaedrus is the first one to give a speech to praise love. He begins his speech with the claim that Love is a primordial god, with no parents.... ...
All the previous speeches only tackled about the benefits that human gained from love. Agathon described the qualities of the god. Agathon disagree with what Phaedrus said. Agathon believed that Love is the youngest god. He support his idea by saying that love flees old age, living among young people since like attracts like.
I have always thought that there was only one type of love, which was that feeling of overwhelming liking to someone else. I am aware that Lust does exist and that it is separate from Love, being that the desire for someone's body rather their mind. In Plato's Symposium, Plato speaks of many different types of love, loves that can be taken as lust as well. He writes about seven different points of view on love coming from the speakers that attend the symposium in honor of Agathon. Although all these men bring up excellent points on their definitions on love, it is a woman that makes the best definition be known. I will concentrate on the difference between the theory of Common and Heavenly love brought up by Pausanias and the important role that Diotima plays in the symposium.
The other important father-son relationship that exhibits love is the one between Odysseus and Laertes. Odysseus, when he returns, wishes to go see his father. When he confronts his father and tries to hide his identity, he is unable to finish his story because of the great sorrow in his father's eyes.
When eros, commonly referred to as erotic love, is introduced into a person’s life, he or she, in some ways, loses control of their mind and behavior, becoming mad. Eros, by subverting common reason and morals, pushes humans into acting in altered ways in order to obtain or keep the affections of the desired person or object. This madness is prevalent in pop culture and television, as seen in Game of Thrones, and in the relationship between Cersei and Jaime. Eros is a type of love that stems from looking at another through divinity and placing him or her on a metaphysical pedestal of perfection.
In “Sorcerer Love: A Reading of Plato’s Symposium, Diotima’s Speech,” Luce Irigaray argues that Socrates argues for two incompatible propositions, both he learned from Diotima. The first that love is a demonic intermediary and the second is that love is a means to immortality. Luce Irigaray believes that the first position is Diotima’s and that Socrates misunderstood Diotima.
with some very different views of love as brought to us by Agathon, Phaedrus and
Love has been expressed since the beginning of time; since Adam and Eve. Each culture expresses its love in its own special way. Though out history, though, it’s aspect has always been the same. Love has been a major characteristic of literature also. One of the most famous works in literary history is, Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare. This story deals with the love of a man and a woman who’s families have been sworn enemies. There love surpassed the hatred in which the families endured for generations. In the end they both ended up killing their selves, for one could not live without the other. This story is a perfect example of true love.
Love is not a god as the fine philosophers of Greece once suggested. Love is something far more powerful and universal, for not all people believe in gods, yet people cannot refuse the existence of love. Instead, love is a condition of the human body that cannot be denied. True love is obstinate; in the way that music pours into the ears of an audience, love pouring into the heart of a man cannot be stopped, denied, or set off course. Love is a natural instinct. You cannot artificially make love where there is none or where it does not belong. Yet, the condition of being in love grows independent of all rationale. It grows places where an observer may not understand its existence. Attempting to fight love in such a situation leaves even powerful and noble families, such as the Capulets and Montagues, suddenly powerless. When love takes control of two souls, it takes the lovers on a journey. The journey is the growth of love throughout its many progressive stages. In this way, the growth of love between two people is analogous to the growth and development of a painted masterpiece. A work of art and a bond of love both have distinct stages and characteristics. A painting initially begins with a vision in the mind of the artist. This vision is a perfect vision that the artist will strive to replicate on her canvas. Similarly, love often begins on a visual level based on the physical attractions between two people. The vision of the painter is soon transformed into quick, loose sketches. The pencil freely marks the page; the artist has no control over where it goes, he merely paints. Similarly, lovers have no control over their new feeling of love that has taken over their bodies and rendered them helpless. After an artist has loos...
During Plato and Socrates years it was harder to make a clear definition of love due to the fact that most people didn't have a chance to find their perfect match. Due to the politics involved in arranged marriages people didn't have a good chance to meet the person of their dreams and whom they really loved. This gave some sour views of love and the concept of true love. The lower class in the early days was the luckiest class of that time period because they had a chance to seek out the person they wanted to be with because it wasn't important if a merchants' son married a farmers' daughter, but if a prince fell in love with a farmers' daughter the chance of them being able to be together was impossible.