Aristocracy, Oligarchy, And Monarchy By Stephen Douglass

822 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The case against monarchy

Monarchy

a country that is ruled by a monarch (such as a king or queen)

Aristocracy

the highest social class in some countries: the people who have special titles (such as duke and duchess), who typically own land, and who traditionally have more money and power than the other people in a society

a government in which power is vested in a minority consisting of those believed to be best qualified

Tyranny

a government in which all power belongs to one person : the rule or authority of a tyrant

Oligarchy

a country, business, etc., that is controlled by a small group of people

Democracy

a form of government in which people choose leaders by voting

(Merriam-Webster)

With a dictionary definition (cited above), there is little end result between all definitions besides democracy. monarchy, oligarchy, aristocracy, tyranny all translate to few people or individual(s) ruling with power. Indeed, aristocracy and oligarchy are synonymous within this definition, as well as monarchy, aristocracy, and tyranny. The former being ruled by groups while the latter in definition are ruled by individuals. Not much difference. …show more content…

Abraham Lincoln, the president that finally abolished slavery in the United States of America, ran for president against Stephen Douglass. Stephen Douglass desired to keep the disgusting institution of slavery legal, while Lincoln desired to abolish slavery permanently. The position of Douglass and his reasons for preserving the institution of slavery became clear in a speech he gave in 1858. According to civilwarcauses.org, Douglass presented the importance of democracy, and allowing communities to decide weather slavery should or should not be legal. (Speech of Stephen…, 2016) This of course sounds crazy to people in the modern day, but for at least a second time, occurring in the United States and in Greece, democracy upheld the institution of

Show More
Related

  • Social Classes In The Elizabethan Era

    315 Words  | 1 Pages

    Nobility- A high class that were powerful and rich either by being born a noble or by being recognized by a monarch. The noble families were split up into two religions; Catholics and Protestants. Due to the monarch’s fear of the noble class gaining power, this class

    Read More

  • John Parker: An African American Abolitionist

    729 Words  | 2 Pages

    Abraham Lincoln’s election in 1860, Southern states began progress from the Union. Though personally against slavery and convinced the United States couldn’t be both, but was going to have to be all free or all slave states. Repeatedly he said he would not interfere with slavery where it already exists. But he was against in its expansion into territories where it did not exist; and slave owners were determined that they had to be free to take their human property with them if they chose to his move into those

    Read More

  • Lincoln Inaugural Address Analysis

    1028 Words  | 3 Pages

    Reading Lincoln’s first Inaugural Address, one wouldn’t think he would be the president to end slavery.Speaking on outlawing slavery, he says,“I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so.” At the time, Lincoln wasn’t worried about slavery,

    Read More

  • The 1860 Presidential Election

    1204 Words  | 3 Pages

    The presidential elections of 1860 was one of the nation’s most memorable one. The north and the south sections of country had a completely different vision of how they envision their home land. What made this worst was that their view was completely opposite of each other. The north, mostly republican supporters, want America to be free; free of slaves and free from bondages. While on the other hand, the south supporters, mostly democratic states, wanted slavery in the country, because this is what they earned their daily living and profit from.

    Read More

  • The Comparison Of Democracy And Slavery In The United States?

    1124 Words  | 3 Pages

    Abraham Lincoln was a president who not only witnessed slavery first hand, but also witnessed a once cohesive and democratic nation go to war with itself over slavery. Due to this, it makes sense that his definition of democracy would largely be based on slavery. He has seen slavery and the effects, and, for this reason, would put neither himself nor anyone else to be in a position subservient to others. Furthermore, he proposes the idea that anyone who would place themselves above others in this manner differs from democracy, to the magnitude at which they place themselves above those they believe beneath them.

    Read More

  • Pluralism Vs Elitism

    318 Words  | 1 Pages

    Elitism is a theory that describes society being “divided into the few who have power, called elites, and the many who do not, called masses” (Schubert 4). It is described as a few elites

    Read More

  • Direct Democracy Vs Representative Democracy

    950 Words  | 2 Pages

    Direct Democracy vs Representative Democracy The term Democracy is derived from two Greek words, demos, meaning people, and kratos, meaning rule. These two words form the word democracy which means rule by the people. Aristotle, and other ancient Greek political philosophers, used the phrase, `the governors are to be the governed', or as we have come to know it, `rule and be ruled in turn'. The two major types of democracy are Representative Democracy and Direct

    Read More

  • Thomas Jefferson

    763 Words  | 2 Pages

    A "guided republic" is a form of government where an essentially omnipotent council determines the legislation passed by the legislative body. Though the legislative and executive branches may be elected by the people, they supervising power is not and therefore has the ability to rule in any way they please. The council can, and often does, refuse the rights to freedom of press, speech, and religion. They may prevent bills that attempt to revive these powers and, in the same sense, may prohibit people from speaking about ideas that oppose those of the council. This governing group does not hesitate to use violent force to protect their power. At its worst, a "guided republic" is a tyrannical fo...

    Read More

  • Cain and Abel: A Society of Choices

    388 Words  | 1 Pages

    Usually an upper class member of a communal society holds a status that is above those of the lower classes and is beyond their laws.

    Read More

  • Leaders of the Equality Movement

    1414 Words  | 3 Pages

    Frederick Douglas, perhaps the most famous abolitionists in history, made it known that after the Civil War, African Americans should be equal to whites. To Douglas, the definition of equality would be the, “immediate, unconditional, and universal enfranchisement of the black man, in every state of the union.” Douglas reasoned that without this specific right that, “he is the slave of society.” Without the right to vote, African Americans would still be second class citizens to whites, and still subjected to white superiority, especially in the South, which would be very much like slavery. Racism was abundant throughout the United States, so the thinki...

    Read More

  • The History of Slavery

    1218 Words  | 3 Pages

    “Dictatorship naturally arises out of democracy, and the most aggravated form of tyranny and slavery out of the most extreme liberty,” a man by the name of Plato once spoke. Slavery is a topic commonly spoken about through the years of school, however, though commonly reviewed, we still manage to learn something new about the topic every year. There are those like James Oglethorpe who believed slavery was an issue that went against his beliefs, and he spoke out, “[s]lavery is against the gospel, as well as fundamental law of England. We refused, as trustees [of colony of Georgia], to make a law permitting such a horrid crime,” (Source H pg. 280). Nonetheless, there still remained a few who struggled to find the light at the end of the tunnel, few such as Isabella, “When we all gits free, they’s the long time letting us know,” (Source H

    Read More

  • Analysis of Child Raising in Anthem by by Ayn Rand

    557 Words  | 2 Pages

    Totalitarianism is the term that is used to describe the political system where the government holds total authority ove...

    Read More

  • Athenian Democracy Dbq Analysis

    350 Words  | 1 Pages

    Democracy is the structure of government still used today in many countries.The definition of democracy is a system of government where people who rule directly are freely elected representatives.In addition, democracy comes from the Greek word demokratia. Demo meaning people and kratia meaning power of rule. For instance, here is an example, Great Britain has a democratic government since elected officials and laws are voted on by the people and also the representatives they elect. Therefore Athens exemplifies a democratic government. “Athenians would meet and vote on a simple question …. is anyone becoming a threat to democracy? If a simple majority voted yes,then they dispersed and reassembled two months later,

    Read More

  • The American Civil War was Avoidable

    1144 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...ecause of so many sectional differences, each region of America had its own intended President, creating a situation in which the losers of the election would already be organized for revolt. However, given that the parties were what they were, President Lincoln could have proposed a quick but strong compromise, right after he won the election, which would keep the Southerners and other non-supporters satisfied with the new political situation. Unfortunately, slavery-issues had been brewing for far too long for this situation to have an easy way out.

    Read More

  • The Absolute Monarchy Of France In The 17th Century

    731 Words  | 2 Pages

    In this context, an absolute monarch would be revolve around a single leader (usually a king) that would make decisions without the assistance of the aristocracy, such as a the nobility, the parliament, or other organizations that include the interest of wealthy families or government officials. In this case, the king would act alone in deciding the political, economic, and military decisions of the people, which would illustrate the absolute power that is wielded by the individual making the decisions. This governmental interpretation of the term “absolute” defines how a king would rule without the interference or inhibitions of an aristocracy or democratic form of government. Of course, the realization of this type o government can be better explained through the context of the absolute monarchy in France, which was founded in the leadership of king Louis

    Read More

More about Aristocracy, Oligarchy, And Monarchy By Stephen Douglass

Open Document