Arguments Against Vaccines

1963 Words4 Pages

21st century contains lots and lots of diseases that some people can’t be protected from. But with the right vaccination a lot of people lives can be saved. If an unvaccinated child gets exposed the child's body might not be able to fight off the disease; before vaccinations children died from diseases that vaccines now protect. Vaccines help reduce the risk of infection by working with the body’s to immunity. Vaccines are what the disease itself is a part of; it’s like having the disease, but only a portion of it inside of your body. This happens so that your body is familiar with the disease itself, and this helps the immune system fight off the disease when you come in contact with it. Example( Flu) it occurs during the cold half of the year; parents take their kid to get vaccinated so they won’t come in contact with this disease, but what some …show more content…

They think that their are more than what they say that’s inside of the vaccines. Parents fears that vaccines will damage their child. As said on Procon. Parents say that the vaccines has very serious side effects but that is why the doctor will ask if your child is allergic to any type of medication. Parents protested that the government should not be allowed in any of the medical choices. But they do not see that the government supplies us with the money for the vaccines. It just doesnt take $1 to make all of the vaccines that the people need. Also said in Procon it goes against people religious, which i dont think should even be considered a factor in getting vaccinated. Religion plays a big role in getting vaccinated because people tend to want to stick to their tradition. But in this case they basically will have to get vaccinated because in some countries you are required to get vaccinated before entering. So religion should be eliminated from the reasons on why people shouldnt get vaccinated, because its just one big

Open Document