Arguments Against Vaccine Research

485 Words1 Page

Vaccines are invented to cure the disease which is occurred due to bacteria that is spread through air and water. As the days passed, the usage of the vaccines changed. They are used as precautionary medicines. Now raises the debate of whether vaccines should be used as precautionary or used as curing medicines. Vaccines should not be given to children because they might decrease the immunity of the children and also contamination of the vaccine may lead to cancers. Vaccines are causing serious threat to the people, especially to the children. Doctors proved that vaccines will reduce immunity of the person. Actually the vaccines fluid which is injected into the person’s body develops anti-bodies to virus. And the anti-bodies last for the period of time; it may be a year or a year and half. During this period, if the disease virus enters the body then the anti- bodies will …show more content…

For example, Dr. Bernice Eddy at the National Institutes of Health proposed that the SV-40 virus caused cancer in primates but vaccine developers initially assured the public that was harmless to humans. Finally, studies led by Dr. Michele Carbone have proved that this virus is responsible for a number of human cancers like mesothelioma and bone cancer. One study involving 58,000 women found a 13-fold higher risk in brain tumors in women vaccinated with the contaminated vaccine compared to those not exposed to the virus. The above mention facts are just the small example to show that most of the vaccines are contaminated and can cause cancer to human. If this is the case, then there is fact proposed by scientists that “a man on average in his life takes up to 150 vaccinations and children of age 1-3 must take minimum of 24-40 vaccinations”(The medical authorities—the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the American Academy of Family

Open Document