Arguments Against Immigration Reform

1611 Words4 Pages

Unfortunately, advocates against immigration reform have been fighting to keep policies as strict as possible. Examples of these influential advocates include Jeff Sessions (senator of Alabama), Ron Hira (economic policy institute research associate at Howard University), and Hal Salzman (professor of public policy at Rutgers University). Throughout debates of immigration and immigration reform, the people previously listed and others have discussed that the United States is facing a shortage of workers in the STEM fields such as science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Furthermore, these economists and politicians support strict immigration policies as they believe immigrants are posing as a threat to the STEM field jobs available …show more content…

Hal Salzman claims, “The United States college system is now producing twice the amount of STEM graduates annually who are unable to find jobs in their respected fields.” Salzman’s claim attempts to blame the high skilled immigrants for taking away jobs from American workers because they are filling in the jobs that are supposed to be for those graduating in the STEM fields. Salzman continues by adding, “guest workers currently make up two-thirds of all new IT hires, so even as half of Americans with STEM degrees can’t find STEM work, 2 in 3 new jobs in the information technology field are going to labor imported from abroad.” Essentially, if high skilled immigrants continue to be integrated into the STEM field jobs, these high tech companies will have enough immigrant workers to take up a significant percent of the new hire positions. As a result, this will take away jobs from current American employees and the unemployed, which ultimately holds down wages and takes away …show more content…

Non-supporters of immigration reform attempt to denounce these policies on the basis that immigrants are taking away jobs from Americans and keeping wages low. In other words, by restricting the supply of high skilled immigrant workers, it would raise the income of American high skilled workers’ incomes. As stated in Ron Hira’s claims, immigrant replacements are being paid on average $70,000 which would be about 40 percent less than native workers. The Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment Statistic Survey states that an engineer earns 2.5 times more than the median national wage with an average yearly income of $88,720. That average places engineers in the top 5 percent of single income earners. This data shows that immigrants’ earnings are actually only about 10 percent less than the median national wage making immigrants’ wages in reality comparable to those of native high skilled workers in a STEM field occupation. So, would keeping immigrants out to raise American incomes prove to be beneficial for our economy? According to statistics, it actually results in fewer jobs for the

More about Arguments Against Immigration Reform

Open Document