Arguments Against Apple's Ads Analysis

1315 Words3 Pages

Kathlyn Gomendoza Professor Amy Chastain EG102 Analyzing the Argument Against Apple’s Ads “Designed by Doofuses in California,” an online article by Seth Stevenson, gives away its position before the article even introduces its topic. The reader does not need to read much further either to find the author’s argument of choice; Stevenson goes straight to his point. The line directly under the title rings like a painfully honest childhood friend, “Apple’s new ads make the company look lame.” In his article reviewing a commercial from a string of Apple Inc.’s advertisements of 2013, Stevenson provides solid yet possibly fruitless arguments that claims Apple Inc.’s advertisements were ineffective and unoriginal in light of rising competition. …show more content…

He then likened this advertisement to the direction of the company. To begin constructing his argument, Stevenson sets a strong foundation by allowing readers to gain a background and understanding of his claim by providing examples of the company’s commercials. The main advertisement under review showed a collection of scenes from daily life, ranging from the commonplace to the seemingly special. Here, Stevenson notes that the advertisement employs the mushy, overused beauty-of-life trope, which he argues lowers its efficacy. His argument is strengthened when he gives evidence for his claim by stating that surveys of viewers had rated the commercial lower than average commercials. This contrasted strongly, he notes, with the formerly above-average Apple advertisements. However, he does not cite any specific data nor his sources within the body of his article. While support of the surveys was a strong addition, the credibility of the surveys could be called to question, and thus, more specifics as to the nature of the survey (i.e. who conducted the survey) would have been a welcome addition …show more content…

Considering his position on the issue, one of the most obvious questions would be concerning his personal bias toward Apple. However, Stevenson addresses this clearly in his article, stating that he has his own collection of Apple products and acknowledges the charm of choosing the high-quality iPhone over its competitors. Though his use of Apple products does not take away the possibility of a negative inclination, Stevenson’s regular consumption of Apple products tips the scale in his favor. The decidedly negative review is likely not written with a consciously malicious intent. In addition to his personal experience with Apple products, an area that could have been questioned is his expertise in the subject matter of advertisement. After all, his career is in journalism, and he makes certain claims in the article based on grounds that did not cite any data (i.e. using well-known celebrity tropes is inherently ineffective). However, a closer look at Stevenson’s formal education strengthens his case rather than weakens it. Stevenson received a certificate in Economics and Business Journalism, Arts, Entertainment, and Media Management from Columbia University (“Seth Stevenson”). As evidenced by his relatively strong arguments, Stevenson is a solid source for himself, having a strong background on the subject of advertisement

More about Arguments Against Apple's Ads Analysis

Open Document