Argumentative Essay On Robotic Pets

779 Words2 Pages

“Over the course of 12 years, and at a cost of $10 million, Japan’s National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology has developed a robotic animal”(The Rise of the Robotic Pets Elena Soto). Robotic pets verse real ones. Who will win? Are these so called robotic dogs good enough to replace our loyal and faithful dogs and cats. Will they give affection for the affection that is given to them. Can they do what are dogs can do today? Can they go on hikes, fetch a ball? That is why robotic pets can not replace our dogs they do not love their owners, they would not be able to teach kids how to be responsible, and they do not fetch.

First of all robotic pets do not love their owners. Why? They are computer chips: Pieces of metal stuck together with a microchip. Are robots good enough to replace the real ones. Real dogs love their owners and will be a companion no matter what. A robot cannot “And that might just be the problem”(Love in the Time of Robots Frank Mullin). A robot is …show more content…

Robotic dogs are not able to retrieve a ball or go on a walk. Their boring. All robots can do is pet them and they bark. Whoopty do. And according to Frank Mullin “This may or may not be a bad thing.” (Love In time of Robots). With real dogs they fetch, go on hikes and walks and sit on laps on a late night. Its like having a best friend all the time, in the happy times and in the sad times. “before the robotic dog takes its place as man’s new best friend, it might be worthwhile to ask whether giving love to something that cannot love back is truly a friendship at all.” (Love in the Time of Robots Frank Mullin). Some may say that they can do other things. In the end though which one will stay a loyal companion no matter what, a dog not a robot. Its like having a computer instead of a pet. Who wants that? This is why there should not have robots as

Open Document