Argumentative Essay: Are Women Ready For Hillary Clinton?

966 Words2 Pages

Are YOU ready for Hillary? This slogan fills up newspaper headlines, computer advertisement, television commercials and news outlets across the nation. I am constantly faced with this glaring question, but what does it mean? What am I getting ready for? Is this question asking its audience if it is ready for Hilary Clinton or for a woman to be president? If the latter, why do I need to be ready for a woman to be president? Will having a woman president create an unprecedented change to the political system? Are women not just as capable as men to run the country? This slogan markets a dilemma women have struggled with for decades and continue to struggle with in global politics; representation in high level political offices. The United States …show more content…

The American University Women and Politics Institute study entitled Men Rule concluded seven reasons why women continue to be under represented in U.S. politics. The study found women perceive the electoral environment as more competitive and biased against women (Fox and Lawless ii). In conjunction, women are less likely to believe they are qualified to run for office. Women see themselves as less competitive, less confident, more risk adverse, and less likely to receive the suggestion to run for office than men. Furthermore, as women have gained greater recognition in the electoral arena, women’s perceptions of gender bias have become greatly aggravated by the presence of the media. Lastly, women still are largely held responsible for the household and childcare. However, as women have overcome these perceived challenges, voter’s still have not viewed a woman as the best candidate, as seen in the 2008 presidential election. In contrast to the aversion women candidates cite, voters in the United States are largely affected by gender bias in assessing …show more content…

“The war on terror” has dominated the political climate and with this shift to an atmosphere of war, women as prospective candidates’ have become questioned (Lawless 479). The Knowledge Networks national random sample survey found citizens prefer men’s leadership traits and characteristics to women’s. Moreover, men are deemed as more competent in areas of national security and military crises. As a result of these gender stereotypes, citizen’s willingness to support a qualified woman candidate for president is now lower than it has been in decades (Lawless 480). Women are less likely to run for high-level political positions not only due to self-doubt and the lack of encouragement, but also because our society’s concepts of gendered characteristics has greatly reflected on voters belief that women are not assertive, active, or self-confident leaders (Lawless 480). Instead, a woman leader is believed to be compassionate, willing to compromise, and “people-orientated”, which are not valued characteristics in a time dominated by military crises and national security (Lawless 480). Gender stereotyping in politics play a large role for citizen’s who lack the time, ability, or need to delve into candidates’ policies and political stances, and instead rely on gender expectations to assess the candidates (McDermott 271). Thus, in times where

Open Document