More handpicked essays just for you.
The strengths and weaknesses of focus group research
The strengths and weaknesses of focus group research
Strengths and weaknesses of focus groups
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The strengths and weaknesses of focus group research
Focus groups can be used in my Applied Project, and in general, to gain a more accurate idea of how people feel or think. Bryman and Bell (2015) point out that when an interviewer only has one person to interview, that person may say untruths, knowingly or unknowingly, and in a group setting others are more likely to call that person out. More than one person allows individuals to possibly dig deeper in how or why they feel or think a certain way because people tend to feed off of each other and can bring discussions out of others. I may gather a bit more how followership is viewed, dealt with, and ways to improve the understanding and actions of various followers. Another positive for focus groups is that issues the interview is not aware
As a student, practice is crucial to learn group therapy techniques. In order to achieve these practices, I attended 2 support groups of the same topic. Observation and attendance constructs an idea of how group therapy works. Attending this group was important because of the profoundness of its meaning and experiences I have witnessed.
The ethical discernment model described by Slosar (2004) and developed for use at Ascension Health will assist us as we analyze this case. It reminds us that discernment engages our spirituality, intellect, imagination, intuition, and beliefs. It is decision-making that reaches into the heart of our beliefs about God, creation, others, and ourselves. It therefore requires structured time for reflection and prayer from the beginning and throughout the process.
According to Halter (2014), all groups go through three phases of development which includes the orientation (introductory) phase, working phase and termination phase. As facilitators, we used motivational interviewing skills such as open-ended questions so that participants could engage in the discussion and share their experiences. Reflective listening and summary were used to recap some of the points discussed by the participants after each question. The group plan was very helpful in helping us keep up with the time.
Overall, I feel that my focus group discussion was a success. I was able to put together a reflection of the process that covered teaching practices and conceptual framework ideas that were used by their IC’s. The teaching practice discussed was The Big Four and the Conceptual Framework consisted of the teacher’s experiences with valuing diversity, technology integration, and practicing professional ethics in the classroom.
Sample: Study population will be consisted of undergraduate student volunteers who will participate in the fall session of Fit Families for Life.
group of people to get a view of what people actually think about such a wide
To determine the effectiveness of Outreach 360 and the necessity of CRC’s return to Monte Cristi has proved rather difficult due to the people within the organization telling me one set of goals and objectives and the Outreach 360 website painting a much different picture. I have decided however, that I cannot evaluate an organization based off of a conversation I off-handedly had instead of the published goals that Outreach 360 has released on its webpage. Whether or not CRC should return to Outreach 360 may be more subjective and based in my experience but because I must evaluate the organization based off what it has told the world it has done and wants to do, I have decided that Outreach 360 does not effectively meet its goals and never will.
This reflective case study will provide a detailed information of Cardiovascular disease and its significant effect concerning the human body. It aims to determine an effective nursing management and preventative strategies on chest pains through a descriptive discussion in each stage. It will firstly give an overview of the patient and indicate existing complications and any relevant information. The condition will then be analyzed with the use of evidence based journals and appropriate text books while also making theoretical observations when necessary. Furthermore, it will discuss the importance of patient education in the hospital and after discharge to prevent future cardiac events. Evidently with this study it is hoped that in each stage a better understanding of the disease can be achieved along with an improved set of nursing skills for future practice.
... that areas of expertise can be exploited, different people are good at different things. Groups can discuss material, and that discussion can improve the quality of the decision. Groups are less likely to suffer from judgmental biases that individuals have when they make decisions. People are more likely to follow through on decisions made by groups that they are connected to. Also, more monumental decisions can be made in groups, because one member will not be singled out for blame, making the entire group responsible.
According to Toseland and Rivas (2005), group dynamics are “the forces that result from the interactions of group members” (p. 64). These forces refer to either the negative or positive influences towards meeting members’ socioemotional needs as well as goal attainment within a group (Toseland & Rivas, 2005), like within my class work group experience. Some of dynamics that continue to emerge and develop in my group is the effective interaction patterns and strong group cohesion, which has generated positive outcomes and group achievement thus far.
Engleberg, Isa N. and Dianna R. Wynn. Working in Groups. 6th ed. Boston: Pearson, 2012. Print.
..., has also allowed me to gain some insight into what it takes to be a leader within each of the four major group types. Research into these area’s has also provided me with a sense of assurance, that I didn’t have before, in that it has assured me that the techniques I am learning in my counseling program are designed to mold me into the group leader that I wish to be.
Besides medical benefits, working with us and helping with daily activities, animals can help us mentally and socially. This project seeks to know if there is an emotional benefit to owning a pet. My two classmates and I have organized an interview that contains six questions for the participants that can demonstrate their feelings about owning their pet. Each of us completed one interview with a pet owner and was recorded with participant’s consent. After obtaining responses, the interviews were prepared into typed-transcripts and discussed among our group members. We then coded and analyzed the data from our three interviews and examined the findings. We have concluded that pet ownership
can use ourselves as a tool in social group work. We can analyze what is happening around us,
Qualitative data analysis is the process of transforming data into information, information into understanding and understanding into knowledge (Davenport & Prusak, 1998). Furthermore, qualitative data analysis can be described as a blend of scientific studies and artistic style to create an innovative product. The research acts as the primary research tool, and must be able to sustain composer throughout the entire study. In addition, the researcher must be able to pay attention to the small details of the study, without losing sight of the big picture of the study (Chenail, 2012).