Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gun control and public policy
History of American gun culture and history
Gun control not effective
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Harshita Gupta
Ms. Gharibian
English 10H P3
May 30th, 2014
Gun Control: An Annotated Bibliography
Gius, Mark. "The Effect of Gun Ownership Rates on Homicide Rates: A State-level Analysis."
Applied Economics Letters 16.17 (2009): 1687-690. Taylor Francis Online. Web. 29 May 2014. .
This journal is an account of a statistical study that examines the link between gun ownership rates and homicide rates. The results of the study indicate that gun ownership levels are positively correlated with homicide rates, but this study was conducted with a fairly lenient significance level. The study does conclude, however, that having stricter gun control may reduce murders.
This journal is a counterargument for my stance on the topic of gun control. Although it fits my initial opinions on the matter, the data presented in the study is not very statistically sound, and indicates a correlation, and not a causative relationship between gun ownership rates and homicide rates. I would present it in my research paper, but refute its claims with those of more recent studies that I have found in my other references. I would also question the sampling and response method, which was through survey, thus indicating that the results of this study cannot be generalized to the entire population.
This journal was unbiased and took a scientific approach to the topic. However, it does not go very far beyond stating the details of the study, and due to a lack of a counterargument I would not consider it an all-encompassing overview of the subject. However, the information is presented with a neutral and formal tone. I would consider this a reliable source.
Lott, John R. More Guns, Le...
... middle of paper ...
...xperts on the subject. The abundance of opinions and well researched alternatives offered me a complex and analytical look into the possible solutions to the problem at hand, and helped me see that there is no black and white on the issue of gun control. A safe, beneficial compromise can be reached. Although I tend to believe that more guns do lead to less crime, the statistically justified solutions offered in this compilation are the perfect intersection of reasonable control and liberty.
The writings presented in this book are objective and verified with substantial reliable data and statistics. The authors are candid and realistic about the limitations of their knowledge, and do not attempt to seem all-knowing or like a final authority on the subject. The approach is scientific and the tone is unbiased, and I consider this book a reliable and credible source.
However, as far as weapons policies go, gun buyback programs have been criticized as an ineffective means of curbing or preventing firearm violence. Thus, one must ask, does the purchase of firearms from private citizens by law enforcement impact the rate of gun crime, or would other means be more effective in combating this type of crime? According to the Journal of Economics, there are more firearms in the United States than people. Furthermore, the majority of homicides are committed with a firearm (Levitt, 2004). This may indicate that the availability of firearms contributes to gun violence.
Gun control is a very controversial subject now days in politics. My personal view on gun control is that it will never work. I'm am just fore warning you that this paper may be a little bias, but I'll try to give views from both sides.
This source gives knowledge into the main hostile to gun control association, one that has trashed the media for its impact on the issue and has itself been derided for the same reason. It likewise gives point of view on the reasons the NRA refers to that gun control ought to be minimized and gives a counterpoint to the individuals who denounce the NRA as the reason for gun brutality in America. There are numerous different sources too. The examination on the chart that shows gun mishaps verses manslaughters or suicides takes a positive turn on the benefits of
Today in the United States many people argue over the fact of guns being legal or illegal. There are people using guns for personal safety and there are others who use them for crimes, as well as for other situations. Firearm deaths in the United States have slowly been decreasing from year to year with all these bills getting passed to promote a safer country than ever before. Guns are the main weapon for youth suicide, school shootings, and for committing murder. In 2010 there were 2,711 infants, child, and teenage firearm deaths. As in school shootings and in committing murder, studies show shooters often had multiple, non-automatic guns, shootings were planned, most youth tell before shooting, shooters have a history of being bullied or threatened, shooters have mental issues, and shooters have done suicidal gestures before (Gun Control with School Shootings). Although there are people who use guns for murdering, there are also those who oppose guns being used without the proper requirements. 85% of all respondents to the survey supporting requiring states to report people to national background-checks systems who are prohibited from owning gu...
In discussions of Gun Control, one controversial issue has been whether it reduced or increases crime. On the one hand, author Jeffrey Goldberg argues having stricter gun controls could reduce gun violence. On the other hand, author Alex Seitz-Wald thinks increasing civilian gun ownership will not reduce crime. My own view is that if we did have more restrictions to own a gun, we would be more safer and we would have fewer crimes around the world
Supporters of gun control state that to decrease crimes committed with fire arms (which amass a high majority of crimes) guns should be banned from private ownership. This removes guns from the public, therefore taking away the instrument of easily accomplishing crimes. Arthur Kellermann and Donald T. Raey, two gun control advocates, did their own research into the issue and published a discovery of their own; the 43-1 Statistic. In this statistic, Kellerman and Raey state that a gun will be used in a justified shooting one time, while forty three other people are killed by a gun unjustly, either by suicide, accident, or criminal (Heumer 9). According to these two researchers, gun ownership is not worth it. Private ownership of guns saved one life wh...
In this article the author talks about the relationship between gun control laws and gun ownership rates in relation to crime rates. He informs his readers of the studies to determine whether gun ownership rates have any effect on criminal activity being that firearms are the leading cause of murders; and if by making gun control laws stricter will it lower the violent crime rates, and overall homicide rates.
Kellermann, et al. relies upon their analysis to call for stricter gun control measures but because of the unreliability of their conclusions, these findings cannot be accepted as valid. The memo will show these concerns and demonstrate how the analysis provided on Gun Ownership as a Risk Factor For Homicide in The Home is not appropriate for determining changes to policies in gun ownership regulations.
Domenech, Benjamin. The Truth About Mass Shooting and Gun Control. Commentary, Feb 2013, Vol. 135 Issue 2, p.25-29, 5p (Article).
Every day some news related to gun violence are being heard all over the world. Shooting in driveway, public places, schools, homicide and suicide are some of different types of gun violence. Shooting on people and killing them is a big issue in the world and different comments are provided about that. One of the most important of them is about gun control laws. Stingl (2013) says “The term gun control as it is used in the United States refers to any action taken by the federal government or by state or local governments to regulate, through legislation, the sale, purchase, safety, and use of handguns and other types of firearms by individual citizens.” According to this idea gun control laws should be stricter and people should not be able to have access to guns easily. However, there are many other people who believe this idea is not a good solution and never help. This essay will demonstrate for and against views about the topic. People who agree with this idea consider: firstly, stricter laws will reduce violence and gun control means crime control. Secondly, some research shows people with gun are more at risks of getting shot. Thirdly, guns can always be misused by their owners and finally, stricter law is the best and the faster way to control crime and make community safe. While opponents say first of all, guns are necessary for people safety and protection. Secondly, guns are not the only tools for killing and violence; there are other weapons too and finally, gun ownership is human rights.
The use of firearms can lead to an increase in the number of crimes. In contrast with the claim that 2nd amendment can help in reducing the frequency of crimes, there’s a study that shows that using concealed weapons will only make the number of violence and crimes to increase. Statistically the crime rates have gone up. As stated in “Statistics on the Dangers of Gun Use for Self-Defense”. In this text it states “Instead of keeping owners safer from harm, objective studies confirm that firearms in the home place owners and their families at greater risk. Research published in the New England Journal of Medicine found that living in a home where guns are kept increased an individual’s risk of death by homicide by between 40 and 170%. Another study published in the American Journal of Epidemiology similarly found that “persons with guns in the home were at greater risk of dying from a homicide in the home than those without guns in the home.” This study determined that the presence of guns in the home increased an individual’s risk of death by homicide by 90% “. This statistic proves that the use of gun control allows the crime rates to have gone up and increased the individual’s risk of death. Another example is in this statistic it states “least one study has found that carrying a firearm significantly increases a person’s risk of being shot
As an immigrant you cannot expect everything to be right in front of you. You have to work hard and achieve what you want. My whole family came here to the United States to seek a better lifestyle. Being an immigrant, and a child of immigrants is not easy. You are stepping into a whole new world, where the people and language is unknown. Every question you answer with a yes or a no. As you live on, you began to fit into the new lifestyles. But, life was not easy when we first came here. My family struggled to find a job and a house that we can possibly afford. My family tried to not focus on those issues, instead decided to focus more on education opportunities.
Gun Control is a highly controversial issue in the United States for the past several decades. From assassinations to mass shootings, every time guns violence comes together the issue surfaces. People argue that we should act on stricter gun laws in the U.S. to hinder the crime rate. The nation is divided in this issue; both sides taking a firm stance in what they believe what should be done with guns.
If you were to ask me what I thought of my dad's side of the family I would probably say that they are lebanese and make delicious food, I would never imagine that my great grandfather was a Palestinian refugee. Being half mexican and half Lebanese, I've been told many stories of how my parents had to grow up in a different society and country. Things for them were different and I guess you could say hard, but I can guarantee you my grandfathers was harder.
Evaluation: The source seems to be only partially credible since most of the information has been obtained by primary research, but no author is mentioned. Also, the article has been published on the website of the CBS, an American commercial broadcast television network, therefore the information might not be as reliable as others. Nevertheless, in this article there seems to be no bias.