Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reading and writing skills
Reading and writing skills
Reading and writing skills
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Reading and writing skills
Our class recently read the play and watched the movie on The Diary of Anne Frank. In the beginning, Anne Frank and her family along with her families friends go into secret hiding from the holocaust. By the middle it’s clear that living in a confined space in secrecy is very difficult. At the end, the Nazi’s find the secret annex and Anne and and all of the characters die in concentration camps except her dad. Mr. Frank publishes the diary that Anne had written in the 2 years they spent hiding. Many variations have been reproduced based on her diary. After watching the movie and reading the play, I believe that the movie was more impactful than the play. There are many similarities and differences between the play and the movie. One similarity …show more content…
One difference between the play and the movie are the characteristics of Anne. The play explains her as a normal young teenager, lacking a little self confidence in her physical appeal. The movie however, shows her as a very popular girl who is occasionally rather full of herself. Another example of a difference between the play and the movie is the way that Mrs. Frank acts. In the play, she seems like a normal mother (besides her relationship with Anne). In the movie on the other hand, Mrs. Frank is shown as losing her mind a little bit and emotionally going crazy because of the conditions. This may have been eliminated from the play because it was probably hard to word and describe the way Mrs. Frank acted. Finally, one last difference between the play and the movie and possibly the most significant one is burglar scene. In the movie, Peter is downstairs and forgets to close the door to the offices. Once the burglar gets into the building, Peter and Mr. Frank go down to see if he left. They retreated when they heard the burglar though, and hid in silence. The play describes it very differently. In this version, they are hiding when Peter breaks a lamp and it crashes onto the floor. This probably was heard by the burglar and could have cost them their lives. I don't quite know why the play and the movie differ so much but my best guess is because
These changes in the film make the plot more comprehendible to the viewer, and overall make the film more realistic to the viewer than the play does for the
The Play of the Diary of Anne Frank starts out in the annex in the warehouse in Amsterdam, Holland where Anne Frank and seven others hid out during World War II. It opens with Otto Frank and Miep Gies standing in the annex alone in 1945. Mr. Frank had just come home from the concentration camps, being the one survivor from the annex. After conversing for awhile, Miep hands Mr. Frank Anne’s diary from the days of living in the annex. He starts to read the book, as it slowly flashes back to 1942 when it all began…
Though this does not change the plot of the movie, it does greatly affect how it is portrayed, and thus is important to determining which is better. While the play tends to poke fun at itself and not take itself too seriously, the movie usually takes things at face-value instead of satirizing them. One good example of this is a scene near the beginning of the movie, where Cinderella gets her dress to go to the ball. In the play, this scene is played for laughs as the dress just plainly falls out of a tree onto the floor. The play is able to use its budget to its advantage by making cheap but humorous moments like this, such as when Milky dies by just tipping over. The movie, however, cannot do this. Instead, in the same scene, they decide to make a huge extravagant scene of her getting her dress. Some argue this is merely a different interpretation, and this is what makes the movie original. Though this does make the movie different than the play, it’s not a good change. The humor and light-hearted tone of the play, aside from the music, was what made it stand out. Taking that away from it just makes the movie much less interesting to watch.
The play was complete in itself being that it led the reader to use his or her imagination to put together all of the complexities of their interactions. That being said, I would recommend the film over the written play because of how powerful the messages shown by the actors through body language are. They brought a level of depth to the message that the original author was unable to achieve.
Another difference that was instantly apparent in the movie was the absence of the images that pop up every couple of pages during the play. I think the absence of these images slightly undermines the aura of unreality. The presence of the images represents dreams and imagination, which we know are made up, fantasy. The absence of the dreamlike images helps us forget what Tom says at beginning of the play, "the play is memory. Being a memory play, it is dimly lighted, it is sentimental, it is not realistic."
Another major difference in the mood of the play and the movie is in the funeral
Some of the differences I noticed in the play was the Shakespeare streams lines everything causing things to happen more deliberately and seemingly right after the pervious event. He also changes things around in order for the to make more sense in a play format. Other than changing things in order to make in more play friendly I believe
Despite the movie being based off of the play, there are many differences between the play and the movie. Before watching the movie, it is notable that there are already differences between the formats of the two. A play is meant to be on stage, with actors performing in front of live audiences. Unlike films, plays have no chance to edit or start scenes over. With a movie, there is an ability to take on different settings and different locations, while a play can only take on a stage with different backgrounds.
There is other little differences that I noticed added to the story that were in the movie and not the play. There are several scenes where Mother superior is interacting with Sister Veronica. Because of some of these scenes you see another side of Sister Aloysius that presents a more compassionate lady not so wrapped up in doubt. Although Sister Aloysius comes off as a strict woman that really has no sympathy for anyone or anything, which kind of makes you question how the heck she ended up as a nun. In the movie you can clearly see that she has a softer side and actually is hiding behind that tough façade she puts up.
There are even some small differences in The Crucible book and movie. Such as, all of the scenes in the book are place indoors whereas in the movie there are many outdoor scenes. Even the number of girls with Abigail in the movie is much larger than the amount of girls mentioned in the book.
One of the chief differences is that in the film, viewers can observe what is happening in more than one room. In the play, watchers can only see the living room and the balcony. Nobody knows what occurs outside of this set area. In the film, individuals see scenes from an assortment of diverse places such as the dining room, the beach, the woodshed, the bedrooms, and the bathroom. Because of this, watchers can get a larger visual of what transpires outside of the living room.
One thing that happened in the movie and not in the book is when a window shatters it was Mr.Kraler trying to get into the business. The reason why Mr.Kraler had to break the window was because Peter forgot to unbolt the door. In the book/play when the window shatters it is a thief robbing Mr.Frank’s business, not Mr.Kraler. Another difference is in the movie Mrs. Frank burns a pan while she is making lunch which causes there so become smoke. In the book/play it doesn’t say anything about Mrs. Frank burning anything. The third difference is in the book/play it states that Peter and Anne go to Peter’s room to talk and get away from the adults. In the movie it shows that they go up to the attic where they kissed. There are many more differences, but these are just a few of
The years 1942 through 1945 Jewish people were having a very hard time in Europe. Jews in Europe were getting captured by the Nazis and sent to concentration camps. The Historical events that are reflected in the play The Diary of Anne Frank by retelling the events that happened during World War II through the eyes of the people who were in the attic.
First to contrast the movie and the play, In the play the cottage that Annie and Helen would be staying in for Annie to help Helen learn without distractions was all cleaned up and ready to move Helen and Annie into and in the movie the cottage was old and rustic with cobwebs and barely anything inside of it. In the play, Annie and Helen move into the cottage without it being cleaned out, so the cottage was already clean for them. In the movie, the cottage was dirty and yet had to be furnished and cleaned up. In the movie, the director wanted to show what the real cottage looked like and that it needed to be cleaned and in the play the author did not explain what the cottage was like in real life and that it needed to be cleaned out and furnished for Helen and Annie to move into. Next to contrast the play and the movie, in the play, William Gibson uses chimes and lighting to signify time and moving from scene to scene and in the movie Arthur Penn uses music and lighting to signify time.
The movie and play both highlight that. I will highlight some of those similarities and differences between the book and the movie. The movie and book are quite similar. There are more similarities than differences between the two, here are a few.