Animal Farm Response Paper

720 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Critical analysis animal farm

Think of a jigsaw puzzle. Be it 100 pieces, 500 pieces, or even 20 pieces. What is the goal of completing this puzzle? To see the picture, of course. Now in order to see the picture one must accurately place each individual piece together. Understand the purpose of each piece. With a unique shape, each piece has sides that are concave and sides that are convex. To be able to see the full picture, each piece much do it’s job in the correct spot, otherwise the picture will be unclear as to what it is. Similarly, a novel has a theme. An author must use story elements in a way that contributes to the theme, makes it more clear, and is understandable. If an author uses the wrong story elements or doesn't use them purposefully, the theme may not be driven home as intended. Animal Farm, by George Orwell, tells the story of a revolution between the animals and the humans. The author’s use of point of view, mood, and allegory story elements contribute to the theme that respect is not a right but a privilege that must be earned. …show more content…

When the windmill was originally knocked down, Snowball had the idea of rebuilding it with thicker, stronger walls. Napoleon was very opposed to this, only to later change his mind. “He had seemed to oppose the windmill simply as a manoeuvre to get rid of Snowball.” (22). To the rest of the animals, it appeared that Napoleon only changed his mind after thinking about it, but the real reason for Napoleon’s change of thought was revealed through the narrator. It shows the side of Napoleon no animal wanted to believe. Through trusting Napoleon and giving him the benefit of the doubt, Snowball was wrongly accused and the animals were manipulated. Because the animals were not able to see Napoleon’s true colors as the narrator shows the reader, they respected and trusted him

Show More
Related

  • Honesty In Snowball's Animal Farm

    367 Words  | 1 Pages

    Napoleon does not possess honesty which is an important trait in a leader. Napoleon said he wants to make all the animal’s lives better. The windmill had the potential of benefiting the animals. Napoleon claimed the windmill plans were his to begin with, but the animals did not know that it was really Snowball because they are unintelligent and gullible. Squealer actually went to the animals to explain that “Napoleon had never in reality been opposed to the windmill. On the contrary, it was he who had advocated it in the beginning…” (57) and Snowball had just “stolen” the plans from among Napoleon’s papers. The animals built the first windmill three times because it was destroyed so many times. Once Napoleon saw how the windmill could

    Read More

  • Use of Propoganda In Animal Farm

    525 Words  | 2 Pages

    out Snowball, Napoleon told the animals that the windmill was his idea and he just

    Read More

  • Free Essays - Power and Authority in Animal Farm

    629 Words  | 2 Pages

    From the death of Old Major, Snowball, Napoleon, and Squealer replaced him. At first things started off pretty well; the harvest was very good the first year and the reading and writing system had helped some, but had limited success on others.  In time, the leaders of animal farm started to have mixed feelings.  Snowball and Napoleon were in constant disagreement.  An important meeting that was held ended with an astonishing outcome. One decision that was made was concerning the windmill project and the most important decision made was who would be the head animal.  Snowball and Napoleon each gave their input on what needs to be done around the farm.  “Snowball stood up and, though occasionally interrupted by bleating from the sheep, set forth his reasons for advocating the building of the windmill.  Then Napoleon stood up to reply.  He said ver quietly that the windmill was a nonsense and that he advised nobody to vote for it” (57).

    Read More

  • Animal Farm Essay Introduction

    981 Words  | 2 Pages

    Do you know what Marxism is? Do you even understand what it means? Well I bet you have no clue what I am even talking about right now so I’m going to tell you all about Marxism what it is and what types are there. I’m also going to tell you how Marxism relates to Animal Farm the book. I hope after you read this you understand and know what Marxism is. I also hope you enjoy reading this about Marxism.

    Read More

  • Essay On Animal Farm Propaganda

    536 Words  | 2 Pages

    I believe that the most effective propaganda technique used in animal farm is glittering generalities. The reason for this is that they use certain words and phrases to get the animals to do what they want them to do. This is shown in the story when the animals discovered that the pigs were taking the milk and mixing it in with their mash. Squealer tells the animals in response, “It is for your sake that we drink that milk and eat those apples. Do you know what would happen if we pigs failed in our duty? Jones would come back” (52). This is an example of glittering generalities because Squealer uses phrases like your sake, and failed our duty. These words stir the emotions of the animals, and the pigs don’t have to go into specifics or use

    Read More

  • Meaning Behind Animal Farm

    812 Words  | 2 Pages

    Since the animals defeated Mr. Jones, “ And so, almost before they knew what was happening the Rebellion had been successfully carried through: Jones was expelled, and the Manor farm was their,” (39). What occurred here was with the the inspiration Old Major left behind after his death, pigs Napoleon and Snowball were the new leaders of the rebellion, and successfully fought Mr. Jones and his men by the animals attacking them. All the animals were ecstatic about their new found freedom, and to only have to worry about themselves, not some humans. The leaders together were very good at keeping the farm in good shape, with Snowball being very good with words, and Napoleon very good with getting his own way. The only bad thing about this pair is that they argue a lot about the decisions of the farm, and can never agree with one another. Until one day when Napoleon starts speaking ill of the co-leader Snowball, making Snowball get a bad reputation, an example is, “do you know who is responsible for this? Do you know the enemy who has come in the night and overthrown our windmill? SNOWBALL!” (82). This is clearly false for the reason that the windmill was torn apart by the wind, yet Napoleon is so manipulative and wants Snowball to

    Read More

  • Animal Farm Analysis

    1075 Words  | 3 Pages

    George Orwell’s Animal Farm is a book that displays what can occur in a society that is ruled by an oppressive government. By using farm animals, George Orwell shows how an oppressive government can prove to be disastrous and also confining. While the book was originally regarded as a book that parallels the effects of communism, in more recent times the book has also shown to parallel the happenings occurring in what is known as the Arab Spring. Currently, countries involved in the Arab Spring has begun to revolt and rebel against their governments that oppress them in hopes of gaining freedom and equality among the people. These countries include Bahrain, Egypt, Tunisia, Libya, Yemen, and Syria. It is in these countries where the people have grown overly frustrated and angry at their governments that treat them unfairly. While some have become successful in overthrowing their government, there are still those that are struggling. However, Tunisia is not one of the struggling countries but in fact is one that was successful in its revolution. It is in the country of Tunisia were many similarities in its revolution are seen in George Orwell’s book. This paper will attempt to illustrate the equivalences between the events that occurred in Animal Farm but also in the Tunisian revolution.

    Read More

  • Animal Farm, by George Orwell

    579 Words  | 2 Pages

    At the beginning of the story, there were two leaders, Snowball and Napoleon, who were sharing power. Snowball was good with words, honest, good at arguing, was inventive, and believed in technology. He stayed in touch with the animals, and wanted to make things better for them. Napoleon, on the other hand, was bad with words, dishonest, hated arguing, and was not inventive. He wanted to be above all the animals; he didn't care about making things better. He only believed in serving himself. In order for Napoleon to be above all the animals, he had to get Snowball out of the way. Napoleon did that by getting his dogs to scare him away so Snowball would never come back to the farm. Napoleon was now in total control of the farm and the animals. Napoleon and the pigs started acting like humans - they would drink, wear clothes, sleep in beds, fight, and walk. They did everything that they had once said was wrong.

    Read More

  • Animal Farm by George Orwell

    1119 Words  | 3 Pages

    Napoleon’s greatest challenger is Snowball. Napoleon has been evil from the start but now, with Mr. Jones gone there is no-one strong enough to oppose him. He can finally do as he pleases. He only needs to convince the animals. He has always wanted his own way and it seems he will go as far as it takes, even condemn Snowball’s work on the windmill. He knows very well that with the construction of the windmill under Snowball’s guidance, Snowball will be viewed as ‘better’ and would give him power. Power, that he believes, is rightfully his. He knows the windmill will benefit his welfare yet he is still willing to oppose this idea in order to keep Snowball from taking any power. Snowball was a real threat to Napoleon. Unfortunatel...

    Read More

  • How Does Napoleon Gain Power In Animal Farm

    1012 Words  | 3 Pages

    Napoleon would use fear to stop any arguments or dissent. Napoleon introduces his dogs by having them attack Snowball, and then, “He was running as only a pig can run, but the dogs were close on his heels. Suddenly he slipped and it seemed certain that they had him (Orwell, pg 35). Napoleons dogs would get rid of Snowball even when the words in propaganda could not effectively do so. Since this is the first incident the other animals do not know how to react to this situation. Snowball was only capable of running. The use of dogs created fear in all of the animals and made it very easy for Napoleon to ascend to the position of the leader of Animal Farm. Napoleon appeared to change countenance, and sharply ordered Boxer to let the dog go, whereat Boxer lifted his hoof, and the dog slunk away, bruised and howling” () Despite the dogs effectively use fear against the animals it didn’t always work as planned. This is why Napoleon had to get rid of Boxer. Napoleon uses the dogs’ violence to threaten the other animals as well as Boxers fate. Napoleon was a master of using fear to his advantage, and through this fear the other animals followed

    Read More

  • George Orwell's Animal Farm

    584 Words  | 2 Pages

    Snowball and Napoleon held a great deal of contrast between the way they each ruled over “Animal Farm/Manor Farm.” The only thing he did lack, was the ability of pursuasion to the other animals. Snowball had all the right ideas, all to better the whole farm. Napoleon, on the other hand, had a knack for stealing other animals’ ideas, then telling the rest it was his and getting credit for it. His ideas only seemed to benefit the pigs and not the animals. It was this, that led to the crumbling of the farm. Napoleons obsession with becoming the ruler is what got Snowball nearly killed by the dogs...in a plot made by Napoleon. Which then produced a whole new rebellion not of the animals to the humans, but of the animals to the pigs. So for these reasons, Snowball showed better qualities for leadership than Napoleon because he wasn’t selfish and thought about the future of “Animal Farm.” First, the dominated farm animals viewed Napoleon and Snowball differently at different times throughout the book. The way the animals reacted to each leader brought upon new problems of the farm. The animals respected Snowball, and believed that his teachings were all true and had a good cause. Although Snowball and Napoleon had superior qualities leadership, it was clearly Snowball who had the better qualities for running a farm. Under Snowballs’ rule, the animals were generally content with what was going on and were all for it if it was to better the farm. It was obvious that Napoleon had the better half of getting his own way on the farm. However, the animals had some problems with Napoleon but they didn’t know haw to express their feelings and show him that they didn’t like the way he ran things. It was the animals’ ignorance that helped keep Napoleon in rule for as long as it was. The responses were so different between the animals that it must have been a drastic change between Snowball and Napoleon.

    Read More

  • Free Essays - Animal Farm

    990 Words  | 2 Pages

    ANIMAL FARM  About 80 per-cent of all the animals on Animal Farm completely followed the seven commandments.  The other 20 per-cent of the animals would rarely follow all the rules and they were often treated like a piece of dirt.  All the animals on Animal Farm were treated differently according to their social status, where in today’s society everyone should treat everyone equally.  The characters in Animal Farm had many diverse characteristics, some of the animals were powerful, stupid, and sneaky  First of all, Napoleon is a huge Berkshire boar and he clearly is the most powerful of all the animals.  He was able to take complete leadership of the farm because he secretly trained the dogs to attack Snowball.  George Orwell writes, “ ‘Never mind the milk, comrades!’ cried Napoleon, placing himself in front of the buckets.  ‘That will be attended to, the harvest is more important’ (817).&nb describe Napoleon as a leader, “ ‘long live Comrade Napoleon’ ” (846).  All the animals on the farm (no matter what Napoleon did to them) would treat him as a powerful leader and whatever he said they would do.  Often Orwell stirs up controversy about the rebellion, “ ‘forward in the name of the rebellion.  ‘Long live Animal Farm!’ ‘Long live Comrade Napoleon!’ ‘Napoleon is always right.’

    Read More

  • Windmill In Animal Farm

    515 Words  | 2 Pages

    Snowball, who is the original inventor of the windmill, wanted it to ease the workload off of the animal’s shoulders. However, Napoleon, uses the windmill as support from the animals, this helps him establish his dictator persona. “But of all their controversies, none was so bitter as the one that took place over the windmill” (Orwell 48). The windmill then became the center of controversy. Even though Snowball is legitimately the correct one to be trusted and what he is saying is true, the animals still support Napoleon because they are manipulated by his words. Napoleon uses Snowball as a scapegoat for the windmill’s first destruction, this causes the animals to still believe in him. This brings him to

    Read More

  • Things Fall Apart Theme Essay

    1621 Words  | 4 Pages

    For an abundance of authors, the driving force that aids them in creation of a novel is the theme or number of themes implemented throughout the novel. Often times the author doesn’t consciously identify the theme they’re trying to present. Usually a theme is a concept, principle or belief that is significant to an author. Not only does the theme create the backbone of the story, but it also guides the author by controlling the events that happen in a story, what emotions are dispersed, what are the actions of characters, and what emotions are presented within each environment to engage the readers in many

    Read More

  • The Contemporary Relevance of "Animal Farm"

    1768 Words  | 4 Pages

    George Orwell wrote a unique story in 1945 to criticize the political system of that time. He uses animal characters to tell his story. The novel effectively portrays how animals rebel human leadership with the intent to rule themselves. Some animals pursue the rebellion because they believe they are going to be free at last. However, as events turn out, they end up in more oppression by one of their kind. The animals end up in disappointment and slavery. Orwell brings out the political theme carefully. In my opinion, Orwell’s story has relevance to the political and economical system in the developing world today.

    Read More

More about Animal Farm Response Paper

Open Document