Wajd The Message Of Communism In Polish Film

1923 Words4 Pages

It is hard to speak of the history of Polish cinema without situating it in relation to World War II, especially when it is one of the very few channels that express Poland’s national conscience. Through Polish cinema, veteran directors like Andrzej Wajda have been able to convey messages of trauma, disillusionment and fatality. Wajda is arguably one of the most important filmmakers of Poland, who etched his country’s history on the silver screen. The emergence of a state owned film industry through communism was perhaps one of the most significant changes to Polish cinema. Despite the possibility of censorship stifling all kinds of creative expression, Wajda was able to produce groundbreaking films like Ashes and Diamonds (1958) that are rich …show more content…

The director’s message speaks of a possibility of finding purity and beauty like a diamond amidst the rubbish and ashes from a fire. This highly symbolic scene suggests that for Maciek, who represents Polish society from Wajda’s perspective, Krystyna is the diamond, the bearer of hope and stability for a man drenched in the ashes or the aftermath of war. Throughout the film she is represented as a symbolic diamond that emerges from the darkness as a source of light. When Maciek first sees her she shines brightly in a murky bar, and as their feelings develop Maciek is conflicted but in the end chooses to become a subordinate who carries out killing orders. Then Wajda makes it clear that Maciek’s decision to choose fate over independence resulted in a lost diamond. After Maciek’s absence, Krystyna opens a window and a ray of light engulfs her fair figure rendering her invisible. Thus, the role of Krystyna in Wajda’s film is to introduce a moral dilemma rather than play an active role making that decision. Nineteen years after Ashes and Diamonds premiered, Wajda returned with Man of Marble to the silver screen with another female protagonist. However, in this film the female protagonist Agnieszka is the one who is faced with making a decision rather than bringing the social and national concern to a male character. …show more content…

She works tirelessly to get information from those who were a part of the state’s brick laying campaign, and even finds the pursuit of truth of Birkut as her personal mission to find the history of her parents. Her dogged approach shows her immense strength of character and what is mostly striking is her ability to command attention and respect from her male peers. As a female director of an all male crew, Agnieszka is shown to challenge men with ease. For instance, in the film she constantly confronts her television producer for trying to veer her into doing something that would not land them in trouble with legal and censorship issues. Agnieszka’s response is outrage, and she makes her opinions clear that she finds him a coward and that she will oppose his efforts to silence her quest for the truth. In another instance, Agnieszka questions the moral character of the filmmaker who facilitated Birkut’s rise to the nation’s symbol. As a result of contributing to the government’s propaganda efforts, he rises to fame at the expense of others by shrouding and staging the truth in the

Open Document