Andrew Jackson's Abuse Of Presidential Power

879 Words2 Pages

During the "era of good feelings", a tide of nationalism swept the United States, uniting the people and easing political unrest. The peace was like the calm before the storm, however, as during this time the Supreme Court was making rulings on cases that increased federal power and stripped states of their rights, setting the stage for the sectional division of the North and South and the abitrarily powerful executive branch under Andrew Jackson. The era of good feelings began when James Monroe was elected president, right after the war of 1812. Due to America's victory, the United States was enjoying an outburst of civic virtue and nationalism. Party tensions eased and it seemed a time of peace and cooperation in the government. In reality, …show more content…

The consequences of his decisions would manifest in two ways: Andrew Jackson's abuse of presidential power and the nullification crisis. Jackson vetoed more bills than any other president, and was accused of being dicatorial by his enemies. He notably ignored the Supreme Court's decision on the Cherokee issue, ordering federal troops to remove them from Florida anyway. He also destroyed the national bank, without a thought to the negative impact of removing the only stable credit in the country. He earned the nickname "King Andrew I" because, like a king, he did what he deemed best for the country and what was best for his "friends"(through the spoils system), without consulting the other branches of government he was supposed to be working with. Had it not been for the increased federal power the era of good feelings yielded, Jackson would have been forced to stop his abuse before causing the Trail of Tears and Bank Panic of …show more content…

The Tariff of 1828, also known as the Tariff of Abominations, proved too much for South Carolina. The tariff was designed to protect American manufacturing by taxing European-- mostly British-- goods. This, in turn, forced the Europeans to place tariffs on America's exports. The South had no manufacturing centers and relied on the export of cash crops like cotton to proved revenue; this tariff seemed like it was targeting them. With the economic recession making their situation even worse, some South Carolinians went so far as to call for secession from the Union. John C. Calhoun recognized the extremity of such an action and wrote the South Carolina Exposition and Protest in 1828, proposing "nullification" as an alternative. Nullification would allow a state to declare a federal law they declared unconstitutional void within its borders. Henry Clay, fearing rebellion, proposed the lowered Tariff of 1832 in an attempt to cool the southerners' anger, but it was still too high a tax for them to be satisfied. South Carolina enacted the Ordinance of Nullification in 1832. President Jackson viewed this as a serious challenge to the federal government, so serious he was willing to send federal troops to South Carolina to enforce the tariff however they had to. Thankfully that proved unnecessary, as Henry Clay was able to lead Congress in forming a

Open Document