Analyzing The Universe and The Teacup

1219 Words3 Pages

Analyzing The Universe and The Teacup

The Universe and the Teacup is a pretty interesting book with one purpose: To make math seem relevant and cool to people who have decided that they don't like math.

K. C. Cole pushes this idea by explaining how math applies to every imaginable thing in the universe, and how mathematicians are, in a sense, scientists. She also uses quotes to promote the coolness of math: "Understanding is a lot like sex," states the first line of the book. This rather blunt analogy, as well as the passage that explains how bubbles meet at 120-degree angles, supports Cole's theory that math can be applied to any subject. This approach of looking at commonplace objects and activities in a new way in order to associate them with math makes Cole's comparison of mathematicians with scientists easier to understand. It requires one to look at mathematicians not just as people who know lots of facts and formulas, but rather as curious people who use these formulas to understand the world around them.

Chapter two of The Universe and the Teacup deals with exponential numbers. More precisely, it deals with the difficulty humans have in processing very large and very small numbers. The term the book uses to describe this difficulty is "number numbness."

This numbness is natural, stemming from the fact that humans simply do not deal with such numbers very often, and even when they are dealt with, they are seen as words, not rational concepts. The fact that absolutely everyone suffers from this difficulty could prove to be harmful in the future, as population grows at the seemingly infinitesimal rate of 2% per year, an amount that is actually quite large when the current number of people on Earth i...

... middle of paper ...

...ding the whole book, although I encountered many new ways of looking at things, there were only a few ideas that will probably affect me very much in the long run. One such concept is in the chapter about scale. It basically says that if we were much larger, we would collapse, due to physical laws of nature, and if we were much smaller, we would be unable to function, due to similar laws. This gave me the idea that everything is the size it is because it has to be. The scale of things on Earth is the only scale possible for Earth; just as the scale of things on other planets follow the physical laws of that planet. For instance, if people existed on Jupiter, they would have to be extremely large giants, due to the size of the planet. This is the only major change in thought I took away from this book, though it was filled with many interesting new ideas.

Open Document