Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Charles dickens works of influence
How to write a textual analysis essay
Charles dickens works of influence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
I am writing to you to tell you that your book changed my view or perspective if I may. This book “The Wind in the Willows” changed me in a sense. Mr. Graham your book taught me that I have to make hard decisions for myself sometimes. I am also writing to you because I felt like you wanted to change or add something to the story. I just want to know what that thing you wanted to change or add would be that is if you did want to change or add something. I also wanted to argue that Otter did not have a good enough role in this story as he could have had. Otter felt like a character in a movie that you just passed by and never saw again for the rest of the movie. That’s one problem I think this story had. It’s an opinion if you want, you can change it. I still liked your book don’t get me wrong. …show more content…
I only want to discuss this with you because you could have made your characters' human. I say this also because it wouldn’t have changed the story if you made the characters human. If you could tell me the reason for making the characters animals that would be great. It’s ok if you don’t have the time I understand or if you just don’t want to. Second topic I want to discuss with you is, how you got this crazy idea to make a character like Toad, insane Toad. I only say this because the story could have gone on without Toad being a total loon. I know that you can argue that the story wouldn’t be the same or shorter without crazy Toad. I also knew that Toad has a mansion and made a bunch of cars you could have just told us his back story in a lot of detail. The point is, why did you make Toad crazy? Third topic I want to discuss with you is, how you created your characters personalities. Not a single personality is the same. Every single personality is completely different it’s just amazing. Personalities are very unique and amazing. To make one is difficult. To make 5 is just so
It is important to create complex, progressive characters. Characters should speak with intent and purpose. You can establish who a character is through tone and what they say. You can also reveal character through thoughts and background information. Not all characters have to have an origin; they can just be there. You should have conflicting traits between the characters. Challenging your characters adds
could have done a better job in explaining the plot. Facts were thrown in throughout the story
The Sacred Willow (2013) describes the modern Vietnamese history from the 19th to the end of 20th century through Mai Elliott’s personal experience, as well as stories from four generations of her family. Starting with her great grandfather's struggle to become an imperial government official, the book follows the author’s family’s cycle of fleeing violence and building wealth, almost re-starting from zero everytime. It goes further than many books on the French Colonisation of Vietnam and the Vietnam war, taking a closer look at into people of Vietnam, rather than from a geopolitical or military aspect. Since the author and her father works for the French and then the government of the Republic of Vietnam, her sister was with the Viet Minh
"Jeremy Simms & TJ Avery are two relativly minor characters in the story ROTHMC. However, they both reinforce the themes." Discuss Aprox 1000 words
Understanding concepts of this story is important to do because it allows the reader to understand how the characters in the story are exactly feeling. The first main
The dialogue a narrator uses with characters in a short story reflects on how the story is being understood by the reader. A character’s dialogue is assumed to be controlled by the author, and then the reader comprehends the dialogue through different points of view in which is told by a narrator. Which point of view the author uses can change how the reader may understand the story. Understanding a story is not just based off the ability to comprehend the plot, setting, characters, and theme. But importantly, understanding what point of view the narrator is in and whether the narrator has dialogue with characters within the story is important. The short story “Lusus Naturae”, written by Margaret Atwood, it’s a short story told by a first person narrator who is a main character in the story but has very minimum dialogue with the other characters. Another short story, “Sonny’s Blues”, written by James Baldwin, is
In this part I will be talking about all of the good and bad people in this story. I will basically talk about all of the important characters that were in the book throughout it.
The main face of it was that it was entertaining. “All the stories of ghosts and goblins that he had heard in the afternoon, now came crowding upon his recollection. The night grew darker and darker; the stars seemed to sink deeper in the sky, and driving clouds occasionally hid them from his sight. He had never felt so lonely and dismal.” This quote right here is an example of how Washington Irving kept it interesting and also had the reader wanting more and waiting to see what would occur next. The only weakness that I can think of is the fact that it was somewhat predictable, but only in the way that the alpha male gets the girl everyone wants to be with. Other than that, it was a primarily strong story and kept my attention. Furthermore, I think the writer’s main purpose was to entertain! It didn’t exactly seem like something that you would take a life lesson from or that there was a different meaning behind it. The best category it would fit into would be fantasy. I say that because the setting is in a town where it holds a number of legends as well as different creatures, and the legend of the headless horseman was the main one.
Finally I will discuss the main characters situations, and their conflicts from my opinion and if the script meets audience expectations and what the audience gained through the process.
The characters that I have chosen to write about are The Englishman, The Crystal Merchant, and Fatima. The Englishman is well-educated, ambitious and new coming alchemist. He likes adventure and because of this he is crazy enough to join a caravan in search of the alchemist. Along this adventure we find out that he isn't really big on talking. Due to the face that the Englishman and Santiago share a commitment to pursuing their Personal Legends, they quickly become friends. The Crystal Merchant serves as an important friend to Santiago. He is also someone who has become complacent and given up the pursuit of his Personal Legend. He is a good man who is devoutly religious and kind enough to take Santiago in. He fears pursuing his dream to make a pilgrimage to Mecca because he thinks he will have nothing to
In The Way To Rainy Mountain, the author N. Scott Momaday makes a clear use of figurative language throughout the story and descriptive language to describe the nature around them, explains their myths about how their tribe came to be a part of nature, as well as the importance in nature that are a part of the Sundance festival and the tai-me.
I believe that the best topics would be isolation and settings due to the importance of each to the story, setting having the physical effects on the characters and isolation having the psychological effects.
The best discussion was The Ocean at the End of Lane discussion. This discussion was good because of the quality of questions asked. I believe that this literary work left the audience wondering about elements of life, death, and the supernatural. These elements are controversial to people because of the perspectives and beliefs that people have about them. The discussion had almost entirely the whole class pitching in and participating about the literary work. I came away from the discussion still wondering about these controversial elements but I learned from it. I learned from other people’s perspectives and belief’s concerning this subject. This constructed me as a student to use other’s opinions to help shape and determine what my opinion is. The least best discussion was The Sandman: Dream Country. The literary work contains four individual shorter stories inside of it that have their own plot, characters, and setting. This complexity of plot, characters, and setting made the discussion difficult to follow along with as a class. The discussion should be broken up by each individual story. This would allow for more in depth thinking and elaborating on the elements in each story. The discussions in class should be constructive in helping everyone learn. The discussions should incorporate everyone in class where everyone participates and pitches in. I think the discussions should make the class think about life and how the literary work we are discussing can improve
Kenneth Grahame’s The Wind in the Willows is a satirical reflection of the English social structure of the late nineteenth century, during a time of rapid industrialization throughout Europe. Also considered a children’s story, this novel conveys Grahame’s belief in the ability of one to live an unrestrained and leisurely life, free of the obligations of the working class, and entitled to this life through high social status and wealth. The River Bank characters, especially Toad, represent those who live this idle life of the upper class. In contrast, the stoats and weasels of the Wild Wood resemble the proletariat, and an animosity between these two classes existed. The lower classes of the time were subject to poor standards of living, as well as exploitation by the factory owners and businessmen. They developed a resentment and hostile attitude towards the upper classes. In this book, Toad most prominently exemplifies Grahame’s ideal life of leisure and freedom and subsequently has his house taken over by the rebellious working class Wild-Wooders. More importantly though, Toad exhibits many qualities, “that make him, for most readers, the most memorable figure in this book”. Yet many of these characteristics displayed by the aristocratic Toad seem to undermine the author’s attempted, “legitimizing of extreme disparities of wealth and social position” (Keefer).
In conclusion, I stated all the different aspects of growing up. Not only is growing up is weird and different but growing up is hard. Growing up will put you into certain type of situations where you would not love to be put into. Antonio could relate to this so much. Antonio witnessed so much death in the book for a 6 year old. What sucks the most is that he had to go through it at such a young age. It’s not easy to go through stuff like that and the fact that he was so young but he got through it made me proud of Antonio. I don’t like growing up and I’m 16 so it’s strange to see Antonio growing up physically, mentally, and emotionally at such a very, very young age but he’ll get through it and when he does, he’ll be proud of himself. I know I would.