Analyzing Fredericks's Argument

498 Words1 Page

In this scenario, Fredericks would in fact be liable for his dog, Sport, biting Vincent. This scenario is an example of negligence, or an accidental event without willful intent that caused harm to another party (textbook p.262). Fredericks did not intend for his dog to bite one of his hotel guests, as he had him for the sole purpose as a watch dog. However, because of Fredericks negligence towards this outcome, he will be in fact liable. There are multiple elements that must be proved in order to justify that the hotel owner, Fredericks, was negligent. These five elements consist of duty, breach of duty, cause in fact, proximate cause and actual damages. It is the duty of all parties to act reasonably and to not impart unreasonable risk

More about Analyzing Fredericks's Argument

Open Document