More handpicked essays just for you.
Equal pay for athletes regardless of gender
Equal pay for athletes regardless of gender
Gender inequality in the sport economy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Equal pay for athletes regardless of gender
There as been equality in professional sports for a long time. The men are getting paid way more than the women athletes. Some would say that the men should be paid more because watching men is exciting, and women’s sports aren’t fun to watch. Also, because in some sports the men generate more attendance or revenue. Women have started to generate a bigger audience and more revenue in some sports. Women are doing the same thing as men. They work just as hard and maybe harder because they are trying to prove a point to everyone. Women should be paid the same as the men in professional sports. The Women’s U.S. Soccer Team made less than the Men’s U.S. Soccer Team but no one knows why because the women’s team is doing better than the men’s. In 2016, the Women’s U.S. Team filed a complaint to the U.S. Soccer for wage discrimination. They alleged that …show more content…
Also, in U.S. professional soccer league women make less than the men. In the NWSL has a salary cap of $265,000 while the salary cap for the men is $3 million. Alex Morgan is the highest paid American soccer player. She makes about $450,000. Morgan also takes home around $1 million in endorsements (Close). Even though Morgan makes a lot of money, she still makes way less than Landon Donovan, who earned $2 million just from being on the team, let alone the famous soccer players like Cristiano Ronaldo and Lionel Messi. They make tens of millions of dollars each year (Close). The Women’s U.S. Soccer Team should be paid equal to the men’s team because they won the world cup in 2015. They made $2 million from the organization for winning the World Cup. Although, that is a lot of money the German
Isn't it amazing how one little controversial question can cause so much drama? Take the NCAA for instance. Within recent years the question of weather NCAA athletes should be paid or not has arisen and caused them some unwanted attention. Many coaches and sports enthusiast have been interviewed on their opinion. “Students are not professional athletes who are paid salaries and incentives for a career in sports. They are students receiving access to a college education through their participation in sports, for which they earn scholarships to pay tuition, fees, room and board, and other allowable expenses,” (Mitchell). “There has been major discussion recently if college athletes should or shouldn't be paid while they are in school. The first thing opponents say is, "They're already getting a scholarship! That is more than anybody else! Don't be greedy!”(Hartnett). These are just two men’s opinions, but no one needs to give his or her opinion any longer. The answer to this question is unmistakably clear. NCAA athletes do not need to be paid because they get to go to college for free, their living expenses are paid for, and there would not be a fair way to choose which teams are paid and which are not.
Traditionally men have dominated the world of sports however in recent year’s women’s sports have become popular and with their new found popularity, women’s sports have evolved into marketable leagues of their own. Although women’s sports took a huge leap forward, women players still don’t receive the same financial compensation for playing the same sports in the same arenas as their male counterparts. In Purse Snatching by Donna Lopiano, she points out sexism may have a huge effect on this financial discrepancy between women and men athletes. Analyzing sports economics may point to a different reason why women are receiving such a compensation disparity.
Mark Murphy, Director of Athletics at Northwestern University, who participated in an ESPN debate on the topic of paying student-athletes, argues that these athletes currently receive scholarships, whose value, in some instances, totals close to $200,000 over four years. He stated that all student-athletes have made similar commitments to the schools, and that football and basketball players should not be treated any different than other athletes, who participate in sports that are not as popular and lucrative. Paying athletes anything beyond a scholarship, argues Murphy, would cause problems, particularly from a gender equity standpoint. What Murphy seems to referring to when he says "gender equity" is Title IX federal regulations, which cut off federal funding of colleges if those colleges discriminate on the basis of sex. Paying male student athletes more than female student-athletes could possibly be construed as discrimination.
According to the Women 's Sports Foundation, they claim that paying men more for the same sport gives women in the sport less incentive to push themselves and discourages future female participation in the sport. Which is true, why would women want to play the same sport as men and get paid less money. A good example where women get paid much less money for the same sport is a WNBA. Women’s Sports Foundation says that players from the WNBA in the 2015 season, the minimum salary was $38,913, the maximum salary was $109,500, and the team salary cap in 2012 was $878,000. For NBA players in the 2015-2016 season, the minimum salary is $525,093, the maximum salary is $16.407 million, and the team salary cap is an all-time high of $70 million. David Berri’s article on, “Basketball’s gender wage is even worse than you think,” he talks about that in 2013-14, the Phoenix Suns employed Dionte Christmas for 198 minutes. For those minutes–the only minutes Christmas has ever played in the National Basketball Association–he was paid the league minimum of $490,180. However, Diana Taurasi made the All-Women 's National Basketball Association First Team in 2014 and helped the Phoenix Mercury win the league 's championship. That season, she was paid the WNBA maximum salary of $107,500. This is huge difference between the two
Messner, showed that women’s sports took up only 6.3% of airtime while men’s took up 91.4 %.(1989,2004,p.4). And the hit show Sportscenter was showing men more than women at an astounding ratio of 20:1 (Messner, 1989, 2004, p.4). Also the coverage and the after game interviews are far less than men. They don’t get enough exposure showcase the talent and entertainment of a women’s game. If a man is highly masculine and highly skilled at what he is doing, he gains that respect and popularity so easily without really doing a thing. For men this brings money, merchandise, media coverage, and fans. More fans means more and more money. Which conclusively brings more success to the franchise, and that’s one example why male professional sports overpower female. Women have an extreme disadvantage when it comes to this because they are not popular in means of sporting events, they don’t have as many fans, don’t have a lot of people to buy the merchandise, and they don’t have the money to treat you with a higher salary. You don’t see contracts in the WNBA like you do in the NBA, for example the salary cap for each team in the WNBA is $878,000, while the NBA is $58 million. (Garland, 2012). That is a huge difference for playing the same sport in the same country. This also goes hand in hand with endorsements. Men make millions and millions extra from endorsements which women don’t usually get. For example, LeBron James at 18 years old signed a deal with NIKE for $90,000,000 just because he was good at basketball, Nike is lucky LeBron wasn’t a bust, but you would never see a company risk that type of money with a female athlete that young. (USAToday.com,
Another issue that comes into play is the salaries of male professional athletes compared to female professional athletes.
Men and women have been separated since the beginning of life. God put Adam in charge of the Earth. When God created Eve, he took a piece of Adam’s rib from his stomach to create Eve. From this story that came from the bible, men believe that God made them better than women. And this has created a gender inequality between man and woman ever since then. Gender inequality, as stated on The Free Dictionary’s website is, “the difference between women and men in regard to social, political, economic, or other attainments or attitudes, or the problem perceives to exist because of such difference.” I believe that, when it comes to women’s sports, there is a pretty big difference in genders. Some of these differences are caused by men. A good example is that there are an enormous amount of men that take it as a joke. Most men feel that women just do not have the capability to ever have the strength and skills to compete with men. While others look at it as women are too girly to play and that they will cry and complain if they break a nail. Some think women are too fragile and if they try to compete against a man they will get badly injured. I believe these opinions that men have about women in sports, leads to the gender inequalities in it.
One would think that a professional player on an elite team would be making enough money to support herself and continue doing what she loves, but this assumption is sadly false. Rejzovic plays volleyball professionally and has a full-time job as though she is an amateur. According to the chairman of her club team, she is playing the wrong sport and is not of the opposite gender. Rejzovic stated, “Ever since I was a kid, I dreamed of becoming a pro. I thought it would be glamourous, but life as a pro isn’t what I imagined” (Tornkvist, 2016). The discrimination is preventing women from progressing forward in professional sports. Payment has nothing to do with performance because Rejzovic and her team has been number one in the league many times in the past ten years (Tornkvist,
about 22 % less than a low salary for a male soccer player. There are only few high profile female soccer players that have endorsement deals, but even then, their salary is still considered low. Sydney Leroux has been a member of the WNT since 2012. She gained fame for scoring a famous goal in the 2012 Olympics Games to quality the United States to the Semifinal Tournament, they later went on to the Goal Medal, and three years later, she was summon to participated in the 2015 FIFA Women’s Word Cup to represent our country. Leroux’s salary is estimated to be around $60,000 to $92,500 a year, and this includes endorsements, while Jozy Altidore, a member of the Men’s National Soccer Team had an average salary of $6 Million, which does not include endorsement deals. Comparing both athletes (Leroux and Altidore) from a statics point of view, athletes are 25 years, they both play the striker position, both athletes play for Professional Club team, and yet Sydney Leroux has scored more international goals than Jozy Altidore and are expected to perform at the same level
This brings up the conversation of unfair compensation between athletes. If student-athletes were to be paid, there would be unfair pay for athletes throughout different sports. For example, football and basketball players for division 1 schools would be paid more than those who play volleyball, baseball, softball, etc. Unfair compensation would also be involved in the sport itself because those who start on a team would make more than those who are considered 2nd or 3rd string. This would bring havoc to Universities and the only way to make this work would be to pay every athlete in every sport the same
Socio-Economic Conditions & Gender: Women’s sports of lesser popularity such as golf are out-earning more mainstream men’s sports such as soccer. In a culture where sexism in sports is still a heatedly debatable topic; this figure speaks volumes about the value of men’s soccer in society.
No matter what kind of education a woman has in the United States, males’ salaries are always higher. Even though both parties have the same qualifications, males are paid more because that is how America society is. Throughout history, many individuals believe that because of influential, intellectual and sophisticated men are responsible for how America is today. This bigoted mindset deludes that women also played an essential role in making America the way it is currently. Despite the accomplishments and success women can have, there is an economic gap between salaries.
In the Women's National Basketball Association (WNBA), the minimum salary in 2015 was 38,913 dollars and the maximum salary was 109,500. Now compare this to the NBA’s minimum and maximum salaries in 2015: the minimum salary was $525,093 and the maximum salary was $16.407 million. That is a ridiculous difference of more than 15 million dollars between the two maximum salaries (Women’s Sports Foundation). Right now, women’s sports are seen as inferior and is shown by the lack of equality in salaries and prize money. Women and men should be paid equally according to their hard work and dedication. Annual salaries and prize money should reflect the success of a team or a individual player. Equal work deserves equal pay, no matter the
Recently a major issue for women in sports is female coaches and their salaries. The salaries of the male coaches in athletics have continuously been on the rise. And on top of that, the male coaches make 159% of the money that female coaches make. Female participation in College athletics are also on the rise. However, the majority of funding in colleges goes into the men's athletic programs.
“A woman is human. She is not better, wiser, stronger, more intelligent, more creative, or more responsible than a man. Likewise, she is never less. Equality is a given. A woman is human,” Vera Nazarian. Unfortunately now in the United States, women are being treated less than their male counterparts, especially when it comes to professional athletics. In an article entitled, Taking a Closer Look at the Gender Pay Gap in Sports, written by John Walters on newsweek.com, he exclaims, “Each player on the USWNT earns $99,000 per year provided the team wins 20 “friendlies” (exhibition matches), the minimum number of matches they would play. By contrast, each men’s player would earn $263,320 for the same feat and would still earn $100,000 if the team lost all 20 games.” Not only does this topic relate to the difference in pay for women and men in soccer but it also relates to all of the other sports like, basketball, tennis and the many other were males participate too in separate organizations. The topic on whether female athletes should be paid the same as their male counterparts, is a massive debate with two opposing sides. On one side of the debate, people believe male driven associations produce more revenue than female driven associations, the competition in male sports is more intense, and more fans want to see thunderous dunks and the athletic ability of males over the lesser abilities of what females can do. On the contrary, female athletics aren 't given the same recognition or praise, females go through the same types of workouts males go through and they participate in the same types of events, and females don 't have the same abilities as males due to the way they ar...