Analysis Of Zitkala-Sa

990 Words2 Pages

1. Zitkala-Sa talked a lot about different changes, amongst the Native and Non-Native. Her descriptive way of differencing the two from her life experience with the new environment she’s about to experience. For instance, how she uses the telegraph pole. where she could tell the difference, from the one she grew up with to the point that she could tell that it was built by a white man, versus the one her mother “dwelling along the edge of a road thickly bordered with the sunflowers” (Zitkala-Sa). She also talks about how the Indian girls were wearing stiff shoe and closely clinging dresses. The smaller girls wore sleeved aprons and shingled hair (short hair which was cut). She always realized that it seems like the Indian girls didn’t care …show more content…

I get where she is coming from. Because no one would want some to come in one’s life and change how they do things and that’s just what these young people were facing. I think it’s so messed up for someone to do that to the point I am thinking don’t they have a heart or some sense of emotion to see what they are doing to the native culture and community. So, I myself would be upset of this situation, because I hate, when persons try to ruining a person life instead of helping them to be better. Her appearance was drastically changed, after they cut her hair. She felt a piece of her identity vanished forever, also felt she lost her mother after that horrific trauma she went through cutting her hair. Cutting hair in the Native culture meant that a person is either mourning and shingled by cowards. That’s why she thinks that by cutting her hair she believed she lost her mother. Based on my knowledge I believe that “hair” signifies strength in the Native …show more content…

The sounds were very creepy and dull versus where native sound of life was much more vibrant and lively. Sounds in the boarding school was more from the noisy floor “the noisy hurrying of a hard shoe upon a bare wooden floors increased the whirring in my ears” (Zitkala-Sa), there was also a lot of murmuring noises throughout each day. Looking at this tell me that she really misses her type of sounds of nature, though she describes saying that the place was “wonderful land of rosy skies, but the same time she wasn’t happy. Who wouldn’t want to hear the different tone and rhythmic from all the symbols, animals, insets, the sounds of the flowing rivers and trees of the wonderful environment of nature. Another difference that was pointed out between the two was that; they were all thought to be “modest” and have some sort of table manners. I get it a lot it’s always good to be a modest individual no matter what, but different culture and background have their own meaning towards modesty. So, looking at this to force these Indians to adopt to their way of life basically grooming them into the “Americanized” life in those time was the right way to go and live. This have a lot to do with “place and power.” Power and place as we all know plays a very vital role in the Native life. Which goes hand in hand with the nature environment for the native culture. I know that power can sometimes mean the level were ones stand on the hierarchy, but looking at it through a different lens

Open Document