Analysis Of Vlad The Impaler

736 Words2 Pages

Clearly a guy that commits as much violence as he did on that large of a scale has some form of a personality disorder. It is my belief that Vlad the Impaler had an antisocial personality disorder. The first evidence that I have to this belief is his past. As I said before, Dracula and his brother Radu were given to the Turkish prince Mircea as a bargaining chip to keep their people safe (pg 36). While Radu submitted to the Turks and was let free, Dracula wasn’t as submissive, and was subjected to violent abuse and torture at the hand of the Turks at the young age of only 12 (pg 36-37). While abuse doesn’t have a 100% chance of causing antisocial behavior, it is a predicator that will likely cause it. As the book states, “Undoubtedly, this four-year period of captivity, during an …show more content…

Therefore, the killing of a peasant’s wife not only relieves the kingdom of scum but also reinforces his superiority by controlling all aspects of his kingdom. This story also represents Dracula’s lack of empathy, as to the fact that he killed a man’s wife and gave him a new one without even a shed of remorse. There is a reason why he was known as the Impaler. In his short 6-year rule, Dracula killed between 40,000 and 100,000 people, killing more than both Ivan The Terrible and Robespierre combined, mostly through his sacred art of impalement (pg 76). He also used decapitation and the cutting off of limbs one by one until death, and he invented the cartooned action of dropping people from a trap door into a room full of spikes to be impaled (pg 76). Just through the sheer numbers of people he killed, it can clearly be seen that he lacked empathy because no normal person can commit so much death in such as short time without being stained mentally. In addition to these, Dracula also displayed a lack of concern for social consequences and

Open Document