Analysis Of Trifles

750 Words2 Pages

In the early 20th century gender expectations and feminism was different. When trifles was written, it was a period when women had no respect, were inferior, and were put in domestic roles. Women did not have power, until World War One where they were put into industrial roles. Although, the women 's movement was changing things, it did not occur until later on. In the book, Trifles also called Jury of Her Peers, Susan Glaspell incorporated the vast differences of both genders in society in her short story.

Susan Glaspell may have been a proto feminist, due to her In the short story the author explores the unequal relationships of men and women. The feminist movements and suffrage had yet to begin, they came after the short …show more content…

Henderson,” the ending of the story was a significant part. These couple of sentences changed the relationship between men and women. It made women superior, by reversing the roles of gender. Throughout the story men were busy solving John Wrights murder in the farmhouse. Continuing this further, The main suspects were Mr.Hale and his wife, suspected of strangling him. The police were not paying attention to the, “Trifles,” that women were worrying about. Interestingly, the title is ironically called trifles too, it is relevant to the short story. It can take on another meaning, women are treated like trifles as well. The women found all the evidence rather than the men because men did not spend their time in kitchens. Where women spent most of their time , due to isolation. As well as, female and male roles. While Mrs.Hale and Mrs Peters had all the evidence and the choice to hand it in or keep it to themselves. At the end the men were clueless to what they were up to. They figured out that the reason she killed her husband, was because of the endless neglect and emotional abuse she felt towards her husband, Mr.Wright. As they too can relate to her circumstances, all it took was one look and they instantly acted. Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters hid the evidence of the dead canary. Taking a stand, and standing up to men by breaking the law. The central conflicts of the short story is equality, justice and

Open Document