Analysis Of The Shadow Lines By Amitav Ghosh

2025 Words5 Pages

History in Amitav Ghosh’s works is not only a narrative of historical events but also a means of establishing an interconnection between the historical events and the ordinary individuals living during the times. The individual is hit by a historical impact and his story needs narration as much as to the country he belongs. Amitav Ghosh tries to reject the traditional mode of writing history and presents largely a re-visiting and a re-examination of history. Therefore it becomes necessary to understand how Ghosh uses facts and fiction in his writings. He presents the past of the nation as a subject matter that belongs to one and all – the aristocratic and the common people, the rulers and the ruled alike. Ghosh therefore displays the traumatic …show more content…

The narrator in The Shadow Lines presents unpleasant effects of nationalism through his grandmother, who initially supports nationalist ideology, but later turns against it after Tridib’s death in the riots. Hence Ghosh re-examines nationalism through a projection of post-independence loss of faith in nationalism springing from experiences of Partition, migration and displacement. Ghosh’s postcolonial re-interpretation of the past also reflects or asserts a postmodernist disbelief in traditional history, an indispensible characteristic of re-inventing of history. Post-modernist school of history challenges traditional history and its grand narratives, as one that is too imperfect and …show more content…

They are equally mindful of the need to fight against imposing rule of the British government as their historical counterparts. Patriotism in his protagonists does emerge very distinctly. His central character is an ordinary man who wants to make his presence felt, his voice heard. Ghosh’s sturdy assurance that nationalism also burns in the heart and spirit of unhistorical figures makes him give voice to their patriotic zeal. Hence his greatest and utmost concern in including history into his works of fiction is to bring to the fore ordinary individuals, who search for examples to create history for themselves. Refusing to allow his individuality to be inundated in the surge of history the ordinary citizen of a nation attempts to carve a place for himself in the period of history. Thus Ghosh’s novels re-create the ordinary citizen as a distorted and transgressed

Open Document