Analysis Of The Movie Stonewall

1461 Words3 Pages

Stonewall Trying to explain historical events is challenging because there are many sources and versions that can create confusion and misunderstanding of the real facts. In the case of Stonewall, it mostly got recorded to the history by newspapers, photography and the word of people who witnessed that night. However, the problem with these kind of sources, both from that period of time and the current ones, is that most of them are bias or are written with the purpose of influence the audience. Thus, each one of them can be taken as an opinion, leaving many unanswered questions surrounded by theories. In 2015, the released of the movie “Stonewall” about the place where the active movement for the LGTBQ community’ civil rights started, created …show more content…

Besides the reason of being “whitewashing” Hollywood movies about historical events as the LGTBQ community describes, the story justify the throwing of the first brick to a rebel Danny upset with his relationship partner for cheating on him, putting the riots and the people involved on them in the background. However, many movie directors and screen writers take “artistic licenses” in movies about historical events. In this case, the director Roland Emmerich said that Danny is way for the audience to see what happened. Therefore, the movie cannot be used as an historical source because Danny is 100% fictional and it could be an example of misinformation for artistic …show more content…

That’s what makes Stonewall important as what Rosa Parks did when she didn’t give her sit in the bus, at the end it was not the first manifestation and it was not important if she was male or female, the importance is that it was a real manifestation against what was wrong from the point of human rights and for people with black heritage. Therefore, the ideal of the people who fought at Stonewall was to unify the group and be considered for the society. Thus, it is not really important who threw the first brick or if there even was a first brick because it was a group, a big manifestation, with at least one representative for every race, age and distinctions on the LGBTQ

Open Document