Analysis Of The Lottery: The Utilitarian Monster

573 Words2 Pages

A lottery is defined by the US Code (U.S. Code, Title 12, Chapter 2, Subchapter I, § 25a) as “any arrangements” between at least three agents, who, decide to aggregate money to distribute it later one of the winners of the lottery. The US code listed various mean to designate winners. For this post, solely lottery based on random selection are analyzed. This should normally exclude inequality based on physical or intellectual capabilities. Based on Lindsay lottery delimitation, the lottery could, therefore, be translated as a legal and institutionalized gambling owned by sovereign states. Before demonstrating that lottery is an example of the utilitarian monster, this term should be defined. Utilitarian monster is defined by Brusseau (2012, p.118) as a person able to experience extremely excessive sensations of enjoyment. Therefore, the joy of this individual weight heavier than the whole’s. The lottery is designed in a way that plenty of individuals bet trivial amounts of money. However, the winner of this gambling gathers an astronomical monetary reward. …show more content…

Indeed, earning millions of dollars is highly expected to immediately increase the winners’ bliss. On a longer term, whatever the winners plan to do with this money (donations, saving, spending or investing it) will increase his utility. The counterpart for the society has been a few dollars lost by individuals. However, society could argue about the reason for the existence of lotteries. Brusseau (2012, p.113) explained that monetarized utilitarianism consists in translating positive or negative feelings into monetary assessments. This should be done within the framework of utilitarian ethics, which favors “the greatest good to the greatest number” in a society (Brusseau, 2012,

Open Document