Analysis Of The Drag Queen

1306 Words3 Pages

RuPaul Charles, the professional drag queen whose speech style I examined, is one of the more famous drag queens – both in terms of public consciousness and in sociolinguistic research. Sarah Jenkins’s analysis (2013) explores her use of falsetto and intonation changes, the use of empty adjectives and crude sexual humor, and references to gay icons. Findings include the “use of pronouns to titles in order to indicate and support the fact that she [the drag queen] is, indeed, passing as a woman” (Jenkins 2011:11). Interestingly, Jenkins also found instances where the aesthetic transformation from man to woman is directly referenced: “RuPaul first refers to the drag queens who are contestants on the show as “gentlemen” and then later calls the winning drag queen a “woman”.” (Jenkins 2011:12). This draws attention to the transformation, and also rewards the authenticity of the winning drag queen; that she is able to pass as a woman. Jenkins’s analysis is largely discursive, and there is little analysis at the phonological level. Rusty Barrett (1998) also examines RuPaul’s speech styles, particularly the way in which she style shifts to index her racial identity, her sexual identity and her drag queen identity. Barrett compares RuPaul’s speech styles on two talk shows: the Joan Rivers Show and the Arsenio Hall Show “On the Joan Rivers Show, which had a predominately European-American female viewership, RuPaul used predominately White Women Style features, some Gay Men Speech Style features, and no African America Vernacular English features. Conversely, on the Arsenio Hall Show, which attracted a young, mixed audience (mixed in terms of race and gender), RuPaul switched frequently among all three styles.” (Mann, 2011:797).
My study wi...

... middle of paper ...

...Recognizable phonological characteristics include a wider pitch range than in the speech of straight men, hyper-extended vowels, and longer onset /s/ and /l/ duration than in straight male speech (Crist, 1997). Like in the speech styles of stereotypically gay men, hedges, empty adjectives and hypercorrectness are all features in Lakoff’s definition of WWS. Rising intonation in questions, tag questions, the intensive use of “so” and the avoidance of coarse language and jokes also feature (Lakoff, 1975).
The notion that women do not tell jokes or use explicit language is particularly interesting when examined in the context of drag queens; although a drag queen may try to sound like a woman, a key part of their humor and performance style is to use innuendo, jokes, and coarse language. Barrett (1998) cites an AADQ from Texas, introducing a male stripper in a gay bar:

Open Document