Analysis Of The Documentary By Lockdown

829 Words2 Pages

The documentary by Lockdown: Gang vs. Family by Gail Mitchell (2007) interviews gang members that are in the Utah State Prison. The state prison has more gang affiliated inmates than non-gang affiliated inmates. The goal of the prison is to stop or reduce gang violence in both the prison and the surrounding cities. In this film, the young lady they are interviewing is living proof of a sociological theory. Even though the prison has multiple gangs inside, the producers focus on two rivalry gangs for their documentary. A Latino gang called Ogden Trece and a white supremacist group; the two groups go back and forth all the time. The prison has a cell block that is just devoted to gang members and the guards who work in that certain section has …show more content…

According to Cohen, this is caused by the inability of juveniles to achieve status among peers by socially acceptable means (Bohm & Haley p.71). And Merton believes this is caused by the contradiction between the cultural goal of achieving wealth and the social structure’s inability to provide legitimate institutional means for achieving the goal (Bohm & Haley p.71). Going back to Cohen’s thoughts, it could very well be applicable to Natalie because she started her criminal activities when she was a juvenile. Cohen also believes that this affects more of the lower class individuals and for Natalie she grew up in a high crime rate neighborhood. A policeman in the film says that the city of Ogden would get at least one call about a shooting every weekend (Mitchell. 2007). Merton’s idea has five ways a person can adapt to it; those five ways are conformity, innovation, ritualism, retreatism, and rebellion. Natalie conformed to the way her peers and family was behaving, she was also a “drop out” due to her drug addiction. Merton referred a “drop out” to a retreatist (Bohm & Haley p.71). This documentary Lockdown: Gang vs. Family by Gail Mitchell (2007) was a good way to prove the sociological theories that were mentioned in this paper. After reading more about the theories, I applied them to my life and my peer’s lives and it could be a proven fact for everyone and not just criminals. It is just more applicable

Open Document