Exploring Treason: The Aaron Burr Trial Impact

1020 Words3 Pages

Considered more of a personal vendetta then a legitimate case, the Aaron Burr Treason Trial cultivated how judges and lawmakers defined treason based on the Constitution and what executive power the president has when a part of law case that still hold true in America today. Before being tried for treason, Burr was the vice president in the first Jefferson Administration and he killed his rival Alexander Hamilton in a duel that ultimately destroyed any chance of Burr continuing in politics. As a result, Burr started to accumulate men and supplies as he led expeditions out West near Spanish territories to start anew and rebuild his name. However, because his intentions were made unclear and one of his co-conspirators, General Wilkinson, …show more content…

It must be strict so that the president or, in the original case, the monarch cannot abuse their power and silence those who are against his/her leadership. Because Burr’s action of creating an army were only alleged, he was not on the island with the charge of treason was given, and possibly because Jefferson had a vendetta against Burr, he could not be convicted for levying war. Even though Jefferson admitted that the letters he received from Wilkinson contained "such a mixture of rumors, conjectures, and suspicions, as renders it difficult to sift out the real facts, and unadvisable to hazard more than general outlines, strengthened by current information, on the particular credibility of the relator," and George Hay, U.S. Attorney, confided to Jefferson that "[m]y confidence in [Wilkinson] is shaken, if not destroyed," the case against Burr was till thoroughly supported by Jefferson. However, the letters became the prosecution’s downfall when it was discovered that Wilkinson altered the cipher letter. Burr could now use the letters for his defense if Jefferson would hand them over to

Open Document