Analysis Of Texture Profile Analysis (TPA)

912 Words2 Pages

3.4. Texture Profile Analysis (TPA). The texture of fish is an important quality characteristic, it determines consumer acceptance and hence the marketability of the final products. Hultmann and Rustad (2004). Composition and textural attributes play a vital role in popularizing a food product. Texture and flavour appear to be the most important attributes for the consumer (Stow, 1995). Texture profile analysis (TPA) is a technique commonly used in industry for the evaluation of food textural behavior, as it can give an indication of sensory properties (Burey etal., 2009). TPA is useful for gel texture analysis because of the textural parameters …show more content…

Firmness (hardness) is an important aspect of fish quality as opposed to tenderness which is appreciated in meat consumption. (Chéret et al., 2007). Texture profile analysis (TPA) was carried out to determinate the effect of formulated by adding 10% (soybean flour (SF) (S), 10% SF+1% pectin (M) and control (C) samples on the texture of fish products. The values for textural characteristics of fish finger samples prepared from minced common carp fish are given in (Table7). The hardness is related to the strength of gel structure under compression and is the peak force during first compression cycle (Chandra and Shamasundar, 2014). Hardness of the fish finger samples M (9.44) was highest followed by fish finger samples S (7.77) and fish finger samples C (6.69). Similarly, a positive correlation between hardness and pectin content in pear was observed (Ying et al., 2011). Cohesiveness is defined as the ratio of the positive force area during the second compression to that of the first compression. It may be measured as the rate at which the material is disintegrated under mechanical action. Tensile strength is manifestation of cohesiveness. The cohesiveness indicates the ability of the product to hold together …show more content…

Springiness in TPA is related to the height that the food recovers during the time that elapses during end of first bite and the start of the second bite. If springiness is high, it requires more mastication energy in the mouth (Rahman and Al-Mahrouqi, 2009). The springiness of fish finger samples varied and was found to be maximum for samples from M ( 0.76 ) followed by S ( 0 .63 ) and samples C (

Open Document