Analysis Of Sacrality And Aura In The Museum

810 Words2 Pages

The separation of an object from its intended environment is not something usually considered by the typical museum-goer. However, separating religious and cult objects from their original sacred spaces takes away their intended impact on the observer. Because of this, an old religious object placed out of context in a museum with little explanation will not have the desired effect on the viewer. In her 1994 article, “Sacrality and Aura in the Museum: Mute Objects and Articulate Space,” Joan Branham asserts that by placing ritual objects on display in museums out of their original context we strip away their original sacred values, seriously altering their original meaning. She makes the distinction that old religious and cult objects are …show more content…

A modern museum displaying pieces from a variety of time periods must carefully consider where each object is placed in relation to the space it is in and the other objects around it. As Branham mentions in her article, placing two objects from different time periods with vastly different meanings near each other can cause the viewer to unconsciously relate the two in their minds. This takes away the power over the viewer that some religious and cult objects had in their original settings. One way to solve this is to give each object some context on its display plaque. However, reading a description of an objects original meaning can only go so far to a viewer. It is much more effective to create a museum environment that assists the object in accomplishing its original purpose in order to make the viewer actively feel the original meaning of an object. In the article, Branham mentions Silvia Kolbowski's 1993 satirical work, Once more, with feeling, which shows that a museum can artificially manipulate how the viewer interacts with an object. This manipulation can be used in a positive manner to recreate an old religious object’s original scared presence and reflect its true meaning to the modern …show more content…

In the text, Branham mentions that the fifth-century chancel screen with a Greek cross (fig. 1), is a decontextualized display because it is taken out of its original context and allows a viewer to “neutrally stand in its presence” and I agree (p. 35). In its modern display in the Bode Museum, Berlin the fifth-century chancel screen with a Greek cross is placed so that it can be examined by anyone from any angle giving the impression that it was intended to approached by anyone. To the average museum-goer this object’s placement takes away a significant portion of its original meaning. In its original setting this object had a significant religious purpose and was separated from the common person. To maintain an object’s full meaning, a museum must consciously place objects in an artificial setting that gives the same meaning as the original setting. This is very important because as mentioned in the article “unapproachability is a major quality of the cult image” (p. 34). Separating an object from its original surroundings creates an object that is “neutered,” and devoid of its original purpose (p. 35). To maintain an object’s full meaning it is ultimately up to the museum displaying the object to present the object in a way that represents it in its full

Open Document