Regime Made Disaster Summary

903 Words2 Pages

The article Regime-Made Disaster: On the Possibility of Nongovernmental Viewing collected from the book Sensible Politics: The Visual Culture of Nongovernmental Activism, New York, NY: Zone Books, 2012. The author Ariella Azoulay who is an art curator, filmmaker, and theorist of photography and visual culture, currently she is working as an assistant professor at Brown University. However, her study discloses a detail view how the Israeli regime turns the photography of their invasion on Palestinians to benevolent photographs of Palestinian refugees. Here in this article, Regime-Made Disaster: On the Possibility of Nongovernmental Viewing, Azoulay illustrates a detailed understanding about her concept of regime-made disaster as a particular …show more content…

She moreover mentions few noticeable features of Regime-Made Disaster like: though the disaster is fully visible, but citizens are trained not to recognize it as a disaster consequently it is a long time event and develops according to various phases. This kind of disaster represented as a non-disaster or as a disaster only from the victim's point of view. And finally," the means used by the regime to deal with the disaster or to cope with its aftermath do not offer a sweeping solution to end the disaster, but instead focus on side issues and/or are aimed at individual case" (Azoulay,2012:31). To talk about the history of Regime-Made Disaster she says "the first half of the twentieth century saw several regime-made disaster par excellence that were not grounded in democracies, but the second half of the twentieth century has produced disasters that take place within and as a part of the structure of democratic governance itself" (2012:29). Although she is talking here about the century-long history of …show more content…

Although she speaks here about the possibility of nongovernmental viewing, but she does not give us any example of this kind of photography as well as the further studies or the effects of nongovernmental viewing. Here another question also raises that, can we put nongovernmental viewing as an anti-image of the photography of regime-made disaster. And one more question may be added, in contemporary time while the digital platform is open for all and almost everyone is using and carrying a camera it is limiting the opportunity for ruling power to embedded the photographs and reconstruct the field of vision. Though the article was published in 2012 but the author does not talk about the last couple of years, time of the digital

Open Document