Analysis Of Reaching The Limits Of Empathy By Carol Anderson

1736 Words4 Pages

Reaching the Limits of Empathy by Understanding Institutionalized Racism The implications and issues that arise from a history of institutionalized racism are not comprehensible to every member of our society. More specifically, the experience of an African American person living in the United States differs vastly from the experience of a white person living in the United States due to institutionalized racism and appropriation of African American culture. In her essay “Respectability Will Not Save Us,” Carol Anderson discusses the term “respectability politics,” its relation to African American history, and how and why it has not worked in our society. Anderson claims that “respectability politics were always too flawed to be fully viable” …show more content…

Both authors do their best to not exclude their work from a prospective white audience, as the inclusiveness of their messages opens the accessibility of their respective points. By hooking their white audiences, Anderson and Lamar have an opportunity to speak implicitly to their white audiences, which are arguably difficult for Anderson and Lamar to reach due to the aforementioned sense of guilt held by a typical white audience member. Anderson discusses the death of Trayvon Martin in depth, provides multiple hyperlinks focused specifically on this event, and states, “The traumatized teen became the scapegoat for the way that her inability to model respectability had failed the black community and, with it, any real chance at justice for Trayvon Martin’s death” (Anderson). In regards to Anderson’s purpose, her essay contains many examples of police brutality toward people of color from the past hundred years in order to bring attention to the corruption and violence within our legal systems. Likewise, Lamar provides an important soundbite from an outside source who counters his argument in “DNA:” “This is why I say that hip hop has done more damage to young African Americans than racism in recent years” (Lamar 2:57-3:03). The soundbite was taken from Fox News reporter Geraldo Rivera’s comments about …show more content…

This renders a negative connotation that counters previous validity of the implementation of respectability politics. Likewise, Lamar sets up an abstract definition for his main term, “DNA,” aiding audience comprehension of his argument. In doing this, both authors distinguish their interpretation of the term or idea that drives the entirety of their respective arguments, which overlap to convey that white audiences have a responsibility to recognize their racial privilege. Throughout her essay, Carol Anderson uses the term respectability politics to define attempts by the marginalized African American community to essentially advance their social standings by ‘proving’ to the white community that they are equal through social presentation. Anderson’s essay demonstrates to her audience how racism still exists, even though it may not be as obvious as it was a few decades ago; thus, respectability politics continues to be defective in our society. For example, Anderson begins her discussion of the implications of respectability politics, writing, “African Americans had long been well aware of the U.S.’s “mocking paradoxes” …it was blacks’ vulnerability to legal and extralegal domestic terrorism that defined how tenuous their existence actually

Open Document