Analysis Of Piaget's Stages Of Development

1635 Words4 Pages

Piaget states that a child’s cognitive development has a direct link to the way the child sees the world and their biological development. Essentially what he explains is that the way a child thinks becomes less decentred as they grow older and develop. This essay will go onto explain the four stages of development that Piaget says a child goes through and evidence to support this including his findings. It will then go on to discuss that in fact the developmental stages may be more complex than originally found to be, and Piaget may have underestimated the importance of specific aspects of the child’s experience. Piaget believed that a child goes through four different stages of development. The first stage is called the sensorimotor period, …show more content…

In this stage they learn to place objects and events together (the semiotic function) and engage symbolic play (Piaget, 1964). At the beginning of this stage children’s thoughts tend to be self-centred or egocentric but as they pass through it their thoughts become more and more open-minded and they learn to see things from a different point of view, by the age of seven it was believed that the child was no longer egocentric. Evidence to support Piaget’s claim would be his three mountain task, where the child was presented with three different mountains. They were allowed to walk around and look at the different mountains from different angles they then had to sit at one side. A doll was then placed it very various positions of the table, they showed the child ten photographs of the mountains taken from different angles and were asked what the dolls view what’s. A child would be classified as egocentric if they picked the photograph that showed their own view of the mountains, and if they picked the doll’s view then they were seen as no linger egocentric and would be moving onto the next stage of development. An issue that could be raised is that this process was too complicated to the child. Hughes conducted a study of egocentrism in 1975, which was aimed to be simpler for the child to understand. The task was explained to the child and mistakes were pointed out initially. The …show more content…

This stage is seen as the biggest change so far in a child’s life as logical and operational thought is developed. During this stage the child gets better at conservation tasks. The child’s logic is applied to physical aspects but not yet to others hence concrete operational. It is in this stage that we first see similarities between a child’s thinking and an adults as the thoughts tend to be more sensible and logical. Evidence to support this would be Piaget’s test using the counters; he set out a row of 6 counters for the child and asked them to make an identical row. One of the rows of counters was then spread out and the child was asked whether there was still the same amount of counters there. As the child developed through this stage they would see that there was the same amount of counters still there, therefore concluding Piaget’s experiment that as the child gets older their conservation improves. In 1974 Rose and Blank repeated one of Piaget’s experiments but only asked the child the question, whether after pouring liquid from one glass to a different shaped glass there was the same amount of liquid in the glass, once (McLeod, 2009). They found that more six-year-olds gave the correct answer leading us to believe that children can conserve at a younger age. It is believed that when an adult repeats the question the child believes that the first answer was wrong therefore

Open Document