Analysis Of Paul Revere's The Bloody Massacre

875 Words2 Pages

It’s 1763 and the seven years’ war, quoted by Winston Churchill as “the First World War”, has ended. “Due to the costly war Great Britain’s national debt doubled from £75,000,000 to £133,000,000”(Tax History Project). To pay off their debt Britain turned to the American colonies to pay taxes. The tax acts included the Sugar Act (1764), Stamp Act (1765), Quartering Act (1765), and the Townshend Act (1767). Although angry because of the many taxes placed upon them, the colonists were especially upset with taxation without representation. While colonists were obliged to pay the taxes, they didn’t have any elected officials representing them in the British Parliament. Throughout the next decade patriotism and unity will drive events that’ll increase the drive for independence from Great Britain. “On June 39, 1767 British …show more content…

Paul Revere, American Patriot, took the chance to use the Boston Massacre as a tool of propaganda. One of Revere’s most famous pieces is The Bloody Massacre perpetrated in King Street. The painting is thought to show the bloody event. As a patriot who supported independence, Revere put many changes/twists in his painting to entice his audience that Independence from Great Britain was the right move. His propaganda included the color of the redcoats matching the colonists spewed blood and the daylight sky when the actual event took place after 9:00pm on a cold winter night. The Engraving also stated a poem by Paul Revere himself. In his poem he depicted the British as “fierce barbarians grinning o'er their prey, Approve the carnage and enjoy the day” (Boston Massacre Historical Society). It is agreed that Paul Revere ignored the truth of the event that the result of the deaths were because of the colonist’s disruptive manner or actions. Paul Revere chose to ignore the truth and spread his propaganda to influence that independence from Great Britain was

Open Document