Analysis Of Paul Boyer And Stephen Nissenbaum's Salem Possessed

1423 Words3 Pages

In Salem Possessed, Paul Boyer and Stephen Nissenbaum theorize that opposed to the traditional approach of saying trauma or disease caused the mass hysteria in Salem, it was the way in which the strange behavior of the girls was interpreted as witchcraft by the adults in the community that caused such chaos. In fact, when the first occurrence of affliction happened, nearly a month had passed before the girls made any accusations. During this time, it would’ve been so easy to blame the girls themselves for witchcraft. So why instead were the girls treated as innocent victims in all of this? Simply put, the witchcraft accusations were guided by adults and it was only once the girls were influenced to do so did they started to point fingers. …show more content…

Many people, especially the younger generation, would come together to pray for those who were afflicted. Groups of young people would spend time together transforming these “frolics”, or the times in which the girls would exhibit strange behavior as an opportunity to turn these events for prayer and worship. Some girls even attributed their behavior to a heavenly source, not a demonic one. But perhaps what’s most important is that the groups of young people left behind their subservient roles in the community in favor of leadership positions. Because of the strange behavior of the young people in the community, priests and ministers were able to exploit that behavior for their own benefit. In Northampton, a minister named Jonathan Edwards thought of the strange behavior of the girls and the young people’s reaction to it as a religious revival. Whereas in Salem, one of its most influential ministers, Samuel Parris immediately presumed it to be the work of witches. Both situations started out relatively similar, but once it was seen as witchcraft it gave people the ability to assign blame and that’s what turned a relatively mild situation into a …show more content…

He was an influential man, so anything he said would likely have an effect on others in the town. In 1692 alone, Thomas testified against 12 people and complained about 24. His wife, his daughter Ann, and his servant Mercy Lewis were among the afflicted. The afflictions even spread from his house to that of Thomas Putnam junior. And although those who were torturing the afflicted were imprisoned, the symptoms remained and they started to blame others. In the end, between Thomas and the afflicted Putnam, they managed to convict and imprison Rebecca Nurse and Martha Corey. To understand Thomas Putnam and his family is to understand all of Salem Village; the line between what was personal and what was private was very thin. It was almost a chain reaction, all it took was one influential person to get the ball rolling and once that happened there was no stopping

Open Document