Analysis Of One-L, By Scott Turow

944 Words2 Pages

One-L, by Scott Turow, outlines the experience of attending Harvard Law School as a first year law-student. Turow weaves his experiences with those around him, and intertwines the professors of Harvard law, as well as their lectures. Initially, Turow enters Harvard law in a bit of disarray and awe. As a world of hornbooks, treatises, law-reviews, group studies, and legal terminology unfold beyond comprehension; Turow is confronted with the task of maintaining sanity. Time appears to be the most important variable, as Turow begins to study for contracts, torts, property, civil procedure, and criminal law; because time is so precious, one key-highlight for law-students is to balance family. Moreover, Turow is part of section-1, and two of his …show more content…

However, when Turow went to the psychiatrist, the earliest availed appointment was a month away from the initial point of contact. In Turow’s case, the level of mental stress turned out to be a fair interpretation of the first years-typical experience attending Harvard Law School in the 1970’s. The Socratic method is still practiced by law-schools conducting advocacy training for lawyers entering litigation. Harvard Law School is still considered one of the primary epicenters of legal development-in flux. Scott Turow attended Harvard Law with a publishing contract at-will, though, his depictions are apparently accurate. I think the central theme circle to One-L is to understand that being an achiever who thrives on brilliance must needs be limited within reason. Substance abuse is a zero-sum solution whereas mental deterioration is also noted. Additionally, time is of extraordinary importance regarding the first and only highlight, family is what held life together for Turow in the chaos surrounding his quest for knowledge. In closing, One-L illuminates the silver lining of practicing honor; through the Socratic method at Harvard Law

Open Document