Analysis Of 'Never Let Me Go Lecture'

744 Words2 Pages

Never Let Me Go Lecture The lecture was filled with anticipation of what the speakers might say, what their thoughts on the book were and why it was chosen. When I first listen to the first speaker it sound a lot like our little group meetings and a question flu by “why did I come” or “they are just repeating what I know”. It was only when the first speaker got to the end was went I became more interested.
The sentence or quote that peaked my curiosity was the first quote the was taken out of the book. The speaker read back “I saw a new world coming rapidly. More scientific, efficient, yes. More cures for the old sicknesses. Very good. But a harsh, cruel world. And I saw a little girl, her eyes tightly closed, holding to her breast the old kind world, one that she knew in her hear could not remain, and she was holding it and pleading, never to let her go. That is what I saw, it wasn’t really you, what you …show more content…

Which I have seen to be more of a memo book from the perception of Kathy thoughts. Were the author seem to be unreliable on the truth background of the clone of were they come from, which I pose questions about. In over this entire book was not my favorite to read. The plot was good but I also expected some rebellious actions from Kathy and her two friends. But I do see that having the characters be more flat faced emotions and accept their reality does remind me of our world. The presenters were also good at telling us the book and why they chose the book in the first place. I enjoyed how there were some people who blankly told the truth that they did not like the book and explained why. At first I thought it would be reader who liked the book, but having a conflicting side it good to draw up more ideas. This made me realized that you did not have to like the book to understand the value of expressing your our options to other

Open Document