Analysis Of NARAL And National Abortion Rights Action League

1133 Words3 Pages

Special interest groups are organizations that try to protect the values, and rights of a specific demographic, minority, or political party. The NARAL or National Abortion Rights Action League is one such organization. They have been in existence since 1969, and are the oldest abortion rights group in the United States.
NARAL realized early on that one of the most fundamental and liberating rights a woman can have is to choose how many, if any, children they want to have. There are several organizations that have just recently begun to promote a woman 's right to choose, in third world countries. NARAL advocates for the rights of women, but more importantly the right to choose. It is made up of normal, average citizens, who on a volunteer …show more content…

One is by using specific, convincing, rhetoric, often referred to as “active rhetoric”. For example, on their website, they say: “We need you to take action on your pro-choice beliefs. Every day, anti-choice activists work to take away our right to choose. Pro-choice Americans can never stop standing up for access to abortion, birth control, and sex education. Your action will make a difference for women and families.” This type of rhetoric doesn’t prevent collective action problems, but it does try to combat them. They also give lists of ways you can get involved, providing links to websites that help people get active in protesting abortion clinic violence, defunding, and harassment, among others. Putting the information at people’s fingertips is an incredibly effective way of discouraging collective action problems. People are inherently lazy and self-interested, so going to the trouble to source websites, and search for associated causes and organizations would likely be a huge factor in them saying “oh well, so many other people are helping, I don 't really need to.” Further, they have a donation page that is easily accessible, and prominent on their home …show more content…

The definition of factions according to Madison is: “a number of citizens, whether a majority or minority, who were united and activated "by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community." (conlaw.org) This is arguable and depends largely on the mission, and interests of the individual group. There probably are interest groups that are adverse to the rights of other citizens, however, I don’t believe most of them intend to be. And largely, special interest groups are interested mainly in promoting equality, and the betterment of the lives of those in the minority. The case could be made that special interest groups are adverse to demographics, however, this idea is probably supported by the people who feel threatened by the promotion of equality for the less advantaged. The theory of distributive justice states that diverging from strict equality is acceptable so long as the inequalities in question would make the least advantaged in society materially better off than they would be under strict equality. This I believe is the purpose and goal of most special interest

Open Document