Analysis Of Mark Bittman's Article Is Junk Food Really Cheaper?

1147 Words3 Pages

Mark Bittman’s article “Is Junk Food Really Cheaper?” tells about how people are not really getting their money’s worth when it comes to consuming junk food. He does this by showing the differences between ordering a meal at McDonald’s and cooking a meal at home. The twenty-eight dollars that is spent to feed a family of four at McDonald’s can be put to use making a meal that could last for a couple of days and feed more than four (Bittman 660). Engineered to be addictive, hyper-processed food has a taste that makes people wanting more. Lastly, Bittman addresses the convenience of junk food provides nowadays. Therfore, the cost of junk food is not really cheaper in comparison to a home cooked meal.
The article is intended for is one of non-academic audience based upon the language Bittman uses throughout, thus making it easy to understand by people not in the field of study. Bittman’s purpose of the article is to inform the audience about the cost of junk food in comparison to buying ingredients …show more content…

For example, he writes, “Still, 93 percent of those limited access to supermarkets do have access…” which is an inartistic proof because it is stating a statistic, thus giving the readers a straight fact (Bittman 661). Moreover, he states, that forty percent of inflation in prices of fresh produce in comparison to soda and processed food, which has decreased by thirty percent (Bittman 662). Inartistically, Bittman appeals to the readers when he writes about the alternatives to junk food that people can eat instead. For instance, Bittman writes, “The alternative to soda is water, and the alternative to junk food is not grass-fed beef…but anything other than junk food: rice, grains, pasta, beans…a thousand other things cooked at home” (661). This appeals logically to audience through the use of of reason and common sense instead of the use of statistics and

Open Document