Analysis Of Kurt Vonnegut's '1983: New York'

1025 Words3 Pages

In Kurt Vonnegut’s essay “1983: New York,” Vonnegut makes the bold statement of comparing those with addictions, namely alcoholics and gamblers, to those who are “addicted” to the practice of war preparation. He claims that both preparers of war and gamblers alike, “are ravenous for situations that will cause their bodies to release exciting chemicals into their bloodstreams” (297). Even though this may be true, it can be argued that the chemicals released in the body of a war preparer come from something entirely different than an addiction. These people fascinated with the art of war are born with this fixation, unlike those with an addiction, who are able to cure their disease. The feeling that grows inside the war preparer cannot …show more content…

Whether it be alcohol, narcotics, gambling, or any other real kind of addiction, there are solutions to getting rid of them. There are support groups, nicotine patches, and other ways to rid the addiction, both physically and mentally. For chronic war preparers, though, there is no War Preparers Anonymous group every Tuesday, there is no Twelve Step Program, there is no gum that these people can chew to destroy the thoughts of war that invade their minds. A war preparer has no other choice but to live with the way that their brain has operated …show more content…

The addicts are on a plane filled with people who can cure their illness while war preparers fit in with those whose disease is incurable and those deemed unfit for society. Both groups of people have elements about themselves that are wrong, but the latter group’s elements are worse. The war preparers cannot be cured to the sickness that racks their brain, and to call them an addict, much like Vonnegut does, undermines the process addicts go through to help themselves. These people who love the so-called “art” of war are no sicker than a

Open Document