Analysis Of James M. Mcpherson's A Band Of Brothers

1747 Words4 Pages

In the article “A Band of Brothers” written by James M. McPherson the strength of soldiers is discussed. The purpose of this article is to explain why ordinary men were able to bear the brunt of some of the bloodiest battle that has ever been witnessed. The thesis of this article is Civil War soldiers wrote much about courage, bravery, and valor which all meant the same but ultimately came back to the soldiers showing honor for their town, state, and union.
In the first point that James M. McPherson makes, he explains the soldiers showing their self pride, community, and not disgracing their family. The men show pride in themselves because they didn’t want the people that knew them to think of them as cowards, “ personal honor is the one thing valued more than life itself by the majority of men” (McPherson Essay). If soldiers were to show any cowardice they would generally be rated out by …show more content…

How the courage of the soldier was important to the whole regiment and the man fighting beside you. It explained why a soldier's honor was so important and . Though this article showed important strengths, but it didn’t show all of them. It didn’t explain why the African Americans fought, what other causes of the war there were, preservation of the union, how lincoln’s election affected the war, etc. The Civil War is very similar to the Revolutionary War in that they both occurred in the United States. They both also had major outcomes when the war ended; the Civil war freed slaves and the Revolutionary war gave us independence and the constitution. Though they had these two things in common the Civil war was fought in the south and the Revolutionary war on the east coast. Another major difference in these wars were the death tolls; the Civil war had around 620,000 American deaths and the Revolutionary war had around 26,500 American

Open Document