More handpicked essays just for you.
The effects of multiculturalism on society
The effects of multiculturalism on society
Theories about stereotypes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the article “I’m Not racist, But…” by Neil Bissoondath, Bissoondath deliberates through a series of examples that generalizing an ethnic group through unawareness is considered to be true racism and that multiculturalism of Canada “indulges in stereotypes.” The term multiculturalism according to Wikipedia is the existence and acceptance of multiple cultural traditions which make up Canadian culture. Bissoondath argues in the article that racism is
“vulnerable to manipulate” and that it is “more often than not a willful ignorance and acceptance of stereotypes.” Bissoondath’s article discusses through examples of two men who are very friendly, who make unconscious insensitive remarks that are based on stereotypes. He also goes on to describe
…show more content…
Referring to the article with the same name “I’m Not Racist, But…”, a social psychology lecturer at the University of Sydney, Dr. Fiona White says, “stereotyping is a normal cognitive process that allows us to efficiently categorise things into groups” but “becomes problematic when people begin to endorse certain negative associations and allows these negative associations to affect their behavior towards certain groups.” Bissondath demonstrates The association of Black nurses, The association of Black Artists and The Association of Black Jurists as examples of socially acceptable segregated groups that if presented only to white people the aforementioned would create discomfort. According to Ontario Black History Society Why a Black History Month socially segregated groups and events like Black History Month help groups feel celebrated and equal as she says “when the contributions of people of African descent are acknowledged” and “treated with equality, there will be no need for Black History month.”
Any notable person with medical expertise will testify that racial identities bear no scientific weight and one’s race is only as significant as the person--or culture the said person is submerged in--makes it out to be. When dissected sociologically, “race prejudice [is] an irrational manifestation of individual pathologies” (Racial Fault Lines, 17)... “[that] represent attempts by one group of people to secure for themselves a privileged position in the social structure at the expense of stigmatized and subordinated social groups,” (Racial Fault Lines, 18). And, while the privileged groups’ “superiority” and other groups’ “inferiority” is arbitrary and holds no ethical legitimacy, the damage caused to the “inferior” groups is undeniable and enormously detrimental. Tomás Almaguer, in his insightful book, Racial Fault Lines: The Historical Origins of White Supremacy in California, explores the various ways in which the Mexican, Native American, and Asian populations in the late nineteenth century
Race has been an issue in North America for many years. Eduardo Bonilla-Silva discusses the new racism in his book, Racism without Racists. Bonilla-Silva classifies the new racial discrimination as color blind racism. Color blind racism is then structured under four frames (26). Color blind racism is believed to have lead to the segregation of the white race from other minorities called white habitus. Color blind racism and white habitus has affected many people, whom don’t even realize that they are, have been or will be affected.
Racism is not only a crime against humanity, but a daily burden that weighs down many shoulders. Racism has haunted America ever since the founding of the United States, and has eerily followed us to this very day. As an intimidating looking black man living in a country composed of mostly white people, Brent Staples is a classic victim of prejudice. The typical effect of racism on an African American man such as Staples, is a growing feeling of alienation and inferiority; the typical effect of racism on a white person is fear and a feeling of superiority. While Brent Staples could be seen as a victim of prejudice because of the discrimination he suffers, he claims that the victim and the perpetrator are both harmed in the vicious cycle that is racism. Staples employs his reader to recognize the value of his thesis through his stylistic use of anecdotes, repetition and the contrast of his characterization.
s Kristof’s New York Times article Is everyone a Little Bit Racist?, he argues that even the most enlightened set of people who believe in racial equality can be victims in discriminatory thoughts. He provides examples by stating a few situations where people try to be biased but in the long run become discriminating. “Blacks and Hispanics treated by doctors for a broken leg received pain medication significantly less often than white patients with the same injury” (Kristof, 2014). Principals suspend black students at a much higher rate than white students and even though the use of marijuana is at a similar rate between blacks and whites, police officers arrest blacks more than three times the rate of a white man for the possession of marijuana. These three examples do not necessarily display the actions of a racist, it is a trigger in one 's head that makes a person feel that way. Society has influenced many of us that white people are less dangerous, more intelligent and overall a better person than a black man whether it be displayed via
The book, Blindspot, by Mahzarin R. Banaji and Anthony G. Greenwald, discusses our brain’s hidden biases in which can influence our behaviors against different social groups. From different ideas discussed in Blindspot, racism is defined as conscious thoughts and feelings that provoke repetitive endorsed expressions and actions of hostility, dislike, and disrespect towards a race. Although racism can be defined, distinguishing a racist isn’t quite as clear cut.
Many often justify discrimination through the means of statistical evidence, claiming that groups that are stigmatized deserve their treatment by citing negative attributes about them. However, this paradox is frequently unresolved to even those who realize the fallacy in discrimination. Several researchers in social psychology, including Galen V. Bodenhausen and Jennifer A. Richeson, have offered potential reasons behind this happening; “It should come as no surprise that individuals’ attitudes and stereotypical beliefs affect the way intergroup interactions unfold. Indeed, individuals who harbor negative stereotypes about the group membership of their interaction partners often display behavior that conforms to their stereotypical beliefs”(Bodenhausen & Richeson, 361). This shows how those discriminated against are likely to adapt to their societal status, and thus often behave according to their respective stereotypes. From this, one can begin to infer that this paradox is a reinforcing cycle, and that prejudice forms as a result of discrimination. Building upon this trend, in the final chapters of the text, a Peters reflects on the trends and results derived from Jane’s exercises, and how it related to the act of discrimination itself; “But even more pernicious, [the exercise] also illustrates how the results of discrimination tend
Brown's (1995) definition of stereotyping through prejudice is the 'holding of derogatory social attitudes or cognitive beliefs, the expression of negative affect, or the display of hostile or discriminatory behaviour towards members of a group on account of their membership to that group'. This definition implies that stereotyping is primarily a group process, through the individuals psyche's within that group. A further idea of stereotyping, defined by Allport (1954) as 'thinking ill of others without warrant', is that people 'make their mind up' without any personal experience. This pre judgement about a whole group is then transferred to the stigmatisation of any individuals in that group. It is these ideas that the essay aims to evaluate, through the cognitive process of categorisation and the above definitions that bring about three distinct features of stereotyping, that our cognition can be demonstrated through.
Prejudice, discrimination, and stereotyping are important topics at the cause of debating within social psychology. A stereotype is a generalization about a group of people, in which certain traits cling to all members, regardless of actual individual variation (Akert, Aronson, & Wilson, 2010). As humans, people assign objects and individuals into categories to organize the environment. Individuals do this for not only organization, but also survival. Is stereotyping inevitable? That is the question; according to Devine (2007), it is, but Lepore and Brown (2007) have to disagree. Devine believes that “stereotyping is automatic, which makes it inevitable.” On the other hand, Lepore and Brown are not convinced that stereotyping is automatic, and have claimed, after observation, that it depends on the individual.
The idea that people from majority groups think that they are not prejudiced is a concept known as colorblind ideology. This means that people who claim they are color-blind do not see “color” or race in any way. Many people in hiring positions or college admission claim to take on a color-blindness approach (Richeson and Nussbaum 2003). However, social psychologists would say that implementing the idea of colorblindness is not an effective approach. In order to help in eliminating prejudices actions and thoughts, people need to be aware about their thoughts and actions, even the ones in the subconscious. Adopting the color-blindness thought processes hinders from this progress being made. Especially since, much of the racism that occurs today is known as implicit racism or aversive racism. People from the dominant groups, when given notions about racism, think about it in an overt kind of manner. Overt racism is the idea that
This fallacy restrains the scope of perception a person can view on racism. It is the belief that racism is solely based on prejudices and negative connotations an individual has towards other races. Through this fallacy, racism is simplified drastically, and incorrectly, to justify and categorized ourselves as racist or non-racist. The spectrum of the individualistic fallacy only portrays the extremities of racism on an individual level. A driving reason for the generalization of the taxonomy of racism is the awareness of the ridicule and harsh stigma attached to a racist. Self-evidently, we try to absolve ourselves from being the “ignorant” one and it completely ostracizes the aforementioned institutional racism, and the habitual, well-meaning qualities of everyday racism. To convey the widespread effect of racism, Beverly Tatum, a president of Spelman College, used this analogy of comparing racism to pollution. She declares, “day in and day out, we are breathing it in” (pg.34). The analogy is a representation of the magnitude and relatability of racism. Therefore, limiting our mindset to mere prejudices and “racist” or “non-racist” is ignoring the true problems and creates a much simplified version of the complexity that is racism. There are a bevy of examples of this misconception, it is, seemingly, engulfed in the psyche of a vast majority of the population. A vivid example of this fallacy was depicted to me when one of my Assistant managers at my job uttered the words “don’t jump to conclusions” in a joking fashion. A pair of Hispanics came into the store requesting that a manger sign paperwork for a job they were instructed to complete. A different manager suspected fraud and dishonesty even though the workers had all of the required paperwork. After all had been cleared my Assistant manager joked about not jumping to conclusions, and it was at this moment that I recognized that we often
I have heard a white person tell a black person, that he or she does not act black. I have also heard the statement, “I am not racist, I have a lot of black friends.” When I hear statements like these, it makes me think that people are trying to negatively compare white and black people, even if they are not meaning to. Although I wish we could combat prejudice in the society, I don’t think that we can ever truly stop it, and racism will always be a problem in America” (Friedman, 2007). Unless people stop forming negative stereotypes about different races other than their own, prejudice and discrimination towards races will always be apparent, and passed down to
Human brains, for the sake of processing information efficiently, use a shortcut known as social categorization. Humans categorize people into different groups based on common features. The three primary social categories for humans are: sex, race, and age (Yoder, 2013). Although categorizing is helpful during life experiences, there’s a negative backlash to compartmentalizing human-beings. The backlash lies in the small leap between categorizing and stereotyping. Stereotyping is used much in the way of categorizing, in that, we simplify complex information, organize, and store the data we collect. The difference between categorizing and stereotyping is when human’s stereotype they ascribe certain attributes to particular individuals within a group based on perceived affiliation with said group (APA, 1991). Once the stereotype has been formed, an increased level of expectation arises, which influences human behavior, that then reinforces the stereotype creating a circle of negative attitudes. These negative attitudes give way to sex discrimination; ...
In today’s society the definition of racism and what it entails may vary from person to person and the differences in the definition may be a reflection of alternative perspectives taken on the issue. A lot of the responses to the definition of racism may be based solely on personal experiences including the individual’s interactions with others, how they were raised, and the influences that affected them during their lifetime. With further research it can be discovered that contrary to popular belief, racism is not that simple and cannot simply be described by ones interactions or attitudes towards a specific group of people. Traditional views describe racism as the belief of the superiority of one race above others (Lecture, September 12,
They argue that the stereotypes given to
As Hodson and Victoria (p.344) note, human beings are not born prejudiced. They develop prejudice through socialization process. The role of family, media, and education is crucial in the prejudice in individuals. Stereotyping involves the construction of unfounded ideas and thoughts concerning an individual. Stereotyping involves the construction of unfounded ideas and thought concerning an individual in the same social context (Farley, p.21). The development of stereotypes revolves around the association of individuals with particular labels of identity. The truth is such ideas and propositions cannot be proven in most situations (Brown, p.68). Hence, the individuals who uphold stereotypes in society become prejudiced toward the victims. The difficulty associated with changing stereotypes is connected to the length of time required for internalization. Individuals in particular classes of society are exposed to stereotypes in their social environment for a considerable amount of time. In consideration of the Emmanuel Church shooting, the perpetrator expressed stereotypical idealization of the African American community. He expressed biased attitude through the sole target of African