Analysis Of Human Trafficking

960 Words2 Pages

In the world, we live in people are struggling more than ever to make it to their dreams and are using all the means they can to achieve them. Today over 2 million people move from their homes to search for a better life. However not always do they find the happy ending they are looking for. Sometimes they meet people who could care less about them or their dreams and only want to fulfill their own agenda. Due to their desperateness, they have found themselves as victims of an immoral behaviors, human trafficking! I have chosen to analyze human trafficking. Human trafficking is one of the most popular crimes in the United states and foreign countries. First off, let me explain what human trafficking is human trafficking is “an illegal movement …show more content…

Deontology (sometimes referred to as duty ethics) focuses on what we are obligated to do as rational moral agents. It is particularly important to see that the deontologist does not say that actions do not have consequences; rather, the deontologist insists that actions should not be evaluated on the basis of the action's consequences (Mosser,2013). The ethical issue for human trafficking would be that everyone must implement codes of conduct, enacting government regulations and policies that would not tolerant human trafficking. We have to understand that this is not what humans or children are made for. Now to look at human trafficking from a Deontology standpoint. Deontology focuses on the reasons that an act is done rather than focusing on the consequences (Mosser, 2013). Human trafficking is purely motivated by money and greed. Human trafficking is different than human smuggling and I think people get them confused. Human smuggling is when a person has given consent and has paid, or agrees to pay the smuggler to transfer them across a border or somewhere else (Neumann, 2015). Smuggling is still a crime but it does not exploit and take away a person's basic human rights like trafficking does. Human trafficking is based more upon exploitation of a victim for monetary purposes than transportation of a willing participant as it is with human smuggling (Neumann, 2015). The traffickers get paid for finding the victims and the people who the victims go to known as handlers get cheap or free labor and stand to gain a lot of money from using these people for their own selfish reasoning. This is the basis for seeing human trafficking as immoral, but with deontology we have to look beyond the consequences to the reasoning to make that judgement. Deontology argues that we have a duty, or some would call it an obligation to treat others with respect and dignity (Mosser,

Open Document