Analysis Of Hamlet Act 2

180 Words1 Page

Hamlet Act 2 Hamlet Act 2 starts with a conversation between Polonius and Reynaldo, his servant, about how Reynaldo is to find out about the behavior of Laertes, Polonius’ son. This event foreshadows the Queen and King’s conversation with Rosencrantz and Guildenstern about how Hamlet’s two friends will uncover the reason for Hamlet’s recent behavior change. In their conversation, Polonius tells Reynaldo that he is to ask random people about Laertes and to tell the people about how Laertes, in his youth, gambled, was intoxicated and got into fights. He then tells Reynaldo to spy on Laertes. Through these actions, Polonius shows that he will do almost anything to control his children and their reputations. Throughout this Act, one general theme is revealed. This theme is the scheming of characters to …show more content…

This is shown through Polonius’s discussion with Reynaldo about spying on Laertes, Claudius and Gertrude’s conversation with Reynaldo and Rosencrantz about spying on Hamlet, and Hamlet’s scheme of describing his father’s death in his play to watch Claudius’ reaction and confirm that Claudius

Show More
Related

  • Act 2 Hamlet Dialectical Journal

    293 Words  | 1 Pages

    My so called friends Rosencrantz and Guildenstern whom I know from Wittenberg were invited by my mother and Claudius to spy on me because they were concerned with my behavior and my apparent inability to recover from my father’s death. Claudius wasn’t only worried about me but also worried that Prince Fortinbras’s would attack Denmark thankfully he only asks if his armies could be allowed safe passage through Denmark on their way to attack the Poles. Relieved to have averted a war with Fortinbras’s army, Claudius gives him permission to only pass by. When I saw my friends have arrived I asked why they came to visit they lied and said just to see me I knew my mother and her king were behind this so I didn’t worry much

    Read More

  • Assumptions In Hamlet

    654 Words  | 2 Pages

    When Polonius decides that he wants to know what his son is up to in Paris, he hires Reynaldo to spy on Laertes. His suggestion is that Reynaldo should say he has “some distant knowledge of him, as thus: ‘I know his father and his friends, and, in part, him’” (2.1.14-16). Polonius wants Reynaldo to lie about his friendship with Laertes in order to gain information on him. When Hamlet accidentally kills Polonius instead of Claudius, his mother tells Claudius that Hamlet “whips out his rapier, cries, ‘A rat, a rat!’” before stabbing Polonius behind a curtain (4.1.11). Gertrude swears to her husband that Hamlet had no intention of killing any human. While she is lying to Claudius, she is attempting to protect her son from harsh

    Read More

  • Hamlet Character Analysis Essay

    1622 Words  | 4 Pages

    Fortinbras, Laertes, Hamlet: hero, villain, mechanism of conflict. This triad is necessary to Shakespeare 's celebrated play, Hamlet. Despite his crucial role, the first named character is often absent in productions. Fortinbras represents the brave hero Hamlet wants to be and ultimately becomes, while Laertes represents Hamlet 's emotional self-doubt and self-hatred that drives the play 's conflict. The separate subplots of Fortinbras and Laertes mirror both Hamlet 's contradictory personality and the play’s plot.

    Read More

  • The Role of Minor Characters in Shakespeare's Hamlet

    655 Words  | 2 Pages

    Shakespear uses contrast to highlight the qualities of the characters in Hamlet; this contrast shows up in the minor characters. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, false friends of Hamlet who succumb to Claudius' corruptness, serve as a distinct contrast to the loyal friendship that Horatio shares with Hamlet. Voltimand is used to contrast Polonius' often comic verbosity. While Polonius dresses up all his speeches with the language of the court, Voltimand is able to give his entire report on Fortinbras in a matter of seconds. The most powerful foil in the play is between Laertes and Hamlet. Upon hearing of the death of his father, Laertes becomes enraged, and seeks immediate vengeance; he does not delay, and acts instantaneously. When the ghost tells Hamlet of Claudius' crimes, Hamlet is unable to act. He procrastinates, missing many opportunities to avenge his father, and acts when it is already too late.

    Read More

  • How Does Shakespeare Use Self-Respect Plays When An Individual Respond To Injustice

    949 Words  | 2 Pages

    After Laertes knows about the mysterious death of his father and thinks the King Claudius killed him, he organizes a rebellious army and fight all the way into the castle to get revenge for his father. By the time the messenger comes and tells Claudius and Gertrude that [Young Laertes, in a riotous head, overbears [the King’s] officers.] (Act IV scene iv l.102-103)Laertes’s rebellious army are already at the last door to where the King is. Laertes, as a gentleman from a noble family and a scholar studying abroad, has fairly high self-respect and sense of honor. When his father’s been killed and buried secretly his family lost their honor. Therefore his self-respect pushes him to regain the pride that has been lost, even if it means that he has to act against the head of the kingdom, the King of Denmark, to find out the truth of the death of his father. However his father, Polonius, is the totally opposite of him. Polonius has always been a sycophant to Claudius, everything he says is to please the King. He tells his daughter, Ophelia, that Hamlet doesn’t love her, he is only playing with her. Yet, what he says to the King is that “[He] went round to work, and [his] young mistress thus [he] did bespeak: ‘Lord Hamlet is a prince, out of [Ophelia’s] star. This must not be.’” (Act II scene ii l.147-149) Also, Polonius is willing to “loose [his] daughter to [Hamlet]. Be the [King and him] behind an arras then, mark the

    Read More

  • Polonius Euphemism In Hamlet

    696 Words  | 2 Pages

    Recalling the scene from which Polonius tells Reynaldo to spy and spread rumors about his son gives they audience a different and more controlling take on his character. Usually this scene is seen as irrelevant to the play by stage directors, and critics, but holds more than it seems. This scene shows how manipulative Polonius can really be. He is sneaky and does everything behind the scenes and, unlike Hamlet, does not need verification that he is right. Polonius always thinks that he is right and sees the world as one that revolves around himself. Since he does not doubt himself he has no problem using Reynaldo to sully his son's school reputation. So, it is to say, that if Polonius can forge a note degrading his own son, who's to say he did not forge the note from Hamlet to Ophelia? That irrelevant scene may be important after all, since it shows that Polonius forges letters. Since Polonius always needs to be right, it would be an easy explanation for Hamlet’s madness and give Polonius control of the situation since he told Ophelia to reject Hamlet’s affections. All he has to do is prove that this is the cause for Hamlet’s madness, and the best way to do that is through showing a letter between the two

    Read More

  • Hamlet by William Shakespeare

    1556 Words  | 4 Pages

    Although Polonius had shown great servitude to King Hamlet, Gertrude, and Prince Hamlet, he now serves the very man that killed his former master. Presenting himself to Claudius, this vacillating subject gives the new ruler his utmost respect: “I assure my good liege, I hold my duty as I hold my soul, both to God and to my gracious king” (2.2.46-48). Yes, Polonius does not know that Claudius murdered his own brother. Still, Polonius never questioned how King Hamlet died so abruptly and why his brother married his widow. Without hesitation, this once ...

    Read More

  • Hamlet

    529 Words  | 2 Pages

    In contrast to Laertes speculation of his father’s killer, Hamlet assumes the individual spying on his conversation with Gertrude is Claudius. “Nay, I know not. Is it the King?” (Act III Scene 4 line 28). Without thinking, Hamlet automatically thrusts out attempting to kill who he believed was Claudius and actually kills Polonius.

    Read More

  • Apperance vs Reality in Shakespeare's Hamlet

    849 Words  | 2 Pages

    Claudius is the brother of Hamlet’s late father, and is now married to Hamlet’s mother. Claudius appears to be a sympathetic husband who only has Gertrude and Hamlet’s best interests at heart. He is actually the main conspirator against Hamlet. He arranges for Polonius, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, and others, to spy on Hamlet. When he feels Hamlet is becoming too big of a problem, the ‘loving father and husband’ plans to have his stepson murdered upon arrival in England. Hamlet finds evidence of this, and returns to Elsinore. Claudius receives a letter from Hamlet, stating he will be returning, which causes Claudius to manipulate Laertes by pretending he cares for him. He also claims to mourn the death of Laerte’s father, Polonius, stating, “I loved your father”, in order to convince Laertes to agree to kill Hamlet (IV.vii,34). Claudius arranges for what appears to be a friendly duel between Hamlet and Laertes, but plots to use this match to end Hamlet. He poisons Laertes’s blade, and as a backup, poisons the cup of wine Hamlet is to drink from. Claudiu...

    Read More

  • Act 3.4 Hamlet Analysis

    363 Words  | 1 Pages

    In Act 3.4,Hamlet’s madness is clearly displayed after he murders Polonius,due to his mother calling for help because of her fear with Hamlet. In the text,Hamlet’s tone is intense but emotional as he shares with his mother her faults of marrying her late husbands’ brother. Hamlet says , “No, by the rood, not so.You are the queen, your husband’s brother’s wife,And—would it were not so!—you are my mother” (4.3.14-16). As the scene advances , the ghost of his father , King Hamlet , appears and Hamlet becomes poignant while his mother comes to realize that Hamlet has indeed become mad. Similarly displayed in Branagh’s interpretation , the character of Hamlet is a very serious , but eventually emotional character. Instead of using a bed,Hamlet

    Read More

  • Abuse Of Power In Hamlet

    1252 Words  | 3 Pages

    [4, 1, 40] These idiosyncrasies are observed in the play when Claudius becomes concerned he will lose power as King and the likelihood Hamlet will murder him to avenge his father’s death. This is apparent when Gertrude informs Claudius that Hamlet is, “Mad as the sea and wind, when both contend which is mightier”. [4,1,6] With these thoughts daunting Claudius, he approaches Laertes in a Machiavellian manner to convince him to murder Hamlet, for he knows Laertes is angry, deranged and “Vows to the blackest devil” [4,5,131] after the death of his father. In doing so, Claudius has the intent to use Machiavellian powers over Laertes who is currently mentally unstable, with the objective being that Laertes will murder Hamlet to avenge his own father’s (Polonius) death. Claudius is able to successfully persuade Laertes in a manipulative speech, especially with his snide comment, “Not that I think you did not love your father, but that I know love is begun by time, and that I see a passage of proof.” [4,7,96] Claudius’ malicious comment indicates he is using his power over Laertes, so that the burden and repercussions do not rest on him, so that he may retain his authority as King. By utilizing his power over Laertes, Claudius is successful, as Hamlet is slain, however, as reflected in Claudius’

    Read More

  • Hamlet Scene Analysis

    1382 Words  | 3 Pages

    William Shakespeare’s Hamlet is filled with many schemes and situations that are a challenge to interpret. The play centers around Hamlet, whose uncle murdered his father and married his mother. Certainly no one could blame Hamlet for appearing a little bit crazy after having to deal with that type of trauma. There are several times during Hamlet when Prince Hamlet appears to be crazy. What makes assessing the prince’s mental state more challenging is the fact that Prince Hamlet sets up a play within the play to expose his uncle for killing his father. Hundreds of years after Shakespeare first wrote Hamlet in 1603, scholars still disagree over whether Prince Hamlet is actually

    Read More

  • Hamlet Character Analysis

    1945 Words  | 4 Pages

    The revenge tragedy Hamlet, by William Shakespeare, uses the characterisation and interplay of certain characters to explore many universal themes such as corruption, love and action . Firstly, Hamlets tense relationship with King Claudius espouses the notion of corruption in a political state. Hamlet's relationships with the female characters of the play, Ophelia and Gertrude, offer insight into the nature of men and women, as well as their intrinsic differences. Finally, Hamlet's internal relationship, portrayed through his soliloquys and internal monologues, promote some of the most relevant philosophical themes of the play, such as life, death, action and inaction. These contrasting themes are able to be approached and examined through Hamlet's characterisation as a contrasting figure of the play. These relationships ultimately offer an endless amount of ideas and opinions to the reader. This is highlighted by the perspectives of many respected critics upon the play, such as those by T.S Eliot and Jonathan Bate . All of the explanations offered in this essay are examples of this authors personal understanding of the play.

    Read More

  • An Analysis of the Characters in Hamlet

    1593 Words  | 4 Pages

    1. The Ghost – The Ghost is the ghost of the late king Hamlet, the

    Read More

  • Hamlet: Act V-Scene 2 - The Climax Hamlet essays

    1263 Words  | 3 Pages

         In Act V-Scene 2, as the play begins with Hamlet fill in the detail of what

    Read More

More about Analysis Of Hamlet Act 2

Open Document