Analysis Of Frank And Lillian Gilbreth And Henry Taylor's Followers

993 Words2 Pages

PAY INCENTIVES. According to Taylor, “What the workmen want from their employers beyond anything else is high wages.” This “economic man” assumption led Taylor to believe that piece rates were important to improved productivity . Under traditional piece-rate plans, an individual received a fixed amount of money for each unit of output. Thus, the greater the output, the greater the pay. In his determination to find a better way, Taylor attempted to improve the traditional piece-rate scheme with his differential piece-rate plan. Under the traditional plan, a worker would receive a fixed amount for each unit produced. Seventy-five cents would be received for producing 15 units and P1.00 for 20 units. In contrast, Taylor’s plan required that a time study be carried out to determine …show more content…

Gantt stand out. FRANK AND LILLIAN GILBRETH. Inspired by Taylor’s time studies and motivated by a desire to expand human potential, the Gilbreths turned motion study into an exact science. In so doing, they pioneered the use of motion pictures for studying and streamlining work motions. They paved the way for modern work simplification by cataloguing 17 different hand motions, such as “grasp” and “hold”. These they called “therbligs” ( the name Gilbreth spelled backwards with the t and h reversed). Their success stories include the following: In laying brick, the motions used in laying a single brick were reduced from eighteen to five – with an increase in output, from one hundred and twenty bricks an hour to three hundred and fifty an hour, and with a reduction in the resulting fatigue. In folding cotton cloth, twenty to thirty motions were reduced to ten or twelve, with the result that instead of one hundred and fifty dozen pieces of cloth, four hundred dozen were folded, with

Open Document