Analysis Of Emerson's Essay 'Nature'

480 Words1 Page

Through this quote Ralph Waldo Emerson was trying to prove that the understanding of nature in human is very little, as all humans do is view nature as something that is materialistic. In the first chapter of his essay, "Nature", Emerson says that if humans were to let go of all the materialistic views they have and interact with nature and observe it beyond the items they would understand the true meaning of nature and its value. His theme through this passage is to show that every single object that humans see before their eyes is not nature. The objects that humans see is a piece of art that humans can easily change to become something different. When he describes the farms he sees, Emerson says that no one owns the farms because as a whole the farms are nothing but of the same, meaning they are a whole piece not individual pieces that are scattered. That is the theme that he is trying to portray through this quote and just like stars, though they are always there, everyone just views them as they are always there "for" the humans, but Emerson …show more content…

I was really confused by the thoughts of Emerson and the real meaning behind transcendentalism because of its complex beliefs. I felt that because of the belief of transcendentalism is so complex, it somewhat sounds vague. But, I do agree with Emerson and his ideas of how everyone takes everything around them for granted, not the material world, but of nature itself. I agree because in today's society there are many environmental issues that are harming nature itself and most of the issues are mainly caused by humans which I do agree still happen today as Emerson sees it, but his description of taking nature for granted was that people only focused on the objects in front of

Open Document