Analysis Of Dichotomy An Indian's Looking-Glass For The White Man

1267 Words3 Pages

Upholding the Bible and Christianity throughout William Apess: “An Indian’s Looking-Glass for the White Man”
There is an enormous dichotomy in the 1800s between what the White Christians say about equality of mankind and how the laws they create and impose affect that equality, specifically with the American Indian. William Apess was the first Native American to publish an autobiography, where he explained his life as a Native American and discussed the challenges he faced while attempting to conquer the Americans. In his 1833 essay “An Indian’s Looking-Glass for the White Man,” I will explain how William Apess holds up the teachings of the Bible and Christianity against the actions, laws, and behaviors of the controlling white establishment. …show more content…

He discusses the fact that the Indian women and children are in substandard housing with inadequate necessities while their men are away at sea. He further shares his opinion that those given charge, the “Agents,” are uncaring in regards to the Indians. They only seek to take and ravage the land. Apess also speaks on the disparity of education between the Indians and the whites. (380). This is where he begins the vehement statement of his argument that skin color is the main factor in terms of explaining why his lineage and culture is mistreated. The whites are contradicting theirselves, saying they believe and worship God’s teachings but not abiding by them. According to the scriptures and biblical teachings, there is no difference between people of different skin color in God’s eyesight. The differences are created in the minds and hearts of man, the white man, as documented by …show more content…

It is diplomatic in that he never directly blames the white man for any wrong doing. He simply use rhetorical questions based on the white man’s teachings and explanation of Christianity in reflective imagery to help the white man see himself. Apess crafts his words in such a manner that they are an indictment of hypocrisy and murder against the white man. He does not attempt to get the white man to see the maltreatment and horrid acts from his perspective but rather from the perspective of the white man, the Christian

Open Document