Analysis Of Denying Humanity In Pursuit Of Revenge

1751 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Moral choices in hamlet

Denying Humanity in Pursuit of Revenge Humanity is considered synonymous with compassion and tolerance. These definitions coincide with core Christian values of treating others with respect. These traits culminate into a general understanding that humanity is mainly characterized by having strong morals and conscience. In Paul A. Cantor’s critical essay of Shakespeare’s Hamlet, called “Hamlet’s Christian Beliefs Stifle his Heroic Impulse”, the author attributes many of the protagonist’s decisions to his religion, and more specifically his conscience. Hamlet is about a prince whose father was murdered and replaced as king by his uncle Claudius. Throughout he play, Hamlet contemplates Claudius’ guilt and how to exact revenge in a way …show more content…

This piece takes into account Hamlet’s thoughts of suicide, how his revenge will affect Claudius’ soul, and his dislike of deceit and other violations of Christian law to emphasize Hamlet’s devoutness. This devoutness is demonstrative of Hamlet’s strong moral compass and willingness to follow his conscience. This same consideration of one’s conscience is not demonstrated by two other characters in Hamlet who are in situations similar to Hamlet’s, Laertes and Fortinbras. Laertes is the son of a noble man named Polonius, who Hamlet accidentally murders because he mistook him for Claudius. Fortinbras is the Prince of Norway, whose father was killed by Old King Hamlet in war. All three of these young men have faced the death of their father, and pursue justice. However, Hamlet’s deep sense of morality binds him to Christian doctrine, which prevents him from immediately taking action toward avenging his father’s death. Laertes and Fortinbras lack this dominant moral compass possessed by Hamlet. This is made clear by their immediate, aggressive pursuit of vengeance and their employment of deception as means to an end. Hamlet’s conscience causes him to approach his suspicion of Claudius’ hand

Show More
Related

  • Hamlet Fortinbras Analysis

    1382 Words  | 3 Pages

    In The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark by William Shakespeare, Hamlet, the prince of Denmark, is infuriated with his mother, Gertrude, for marrying his uncle, Claudius, less than two months after his father’s death. Hamlet, the main protagonist, has two characters who act as foils to him, and they are Fortinbras and Laertes. Not only do they want revenge on their father’s murderers, but they are willing to do so at all costs, even if it means destroying their reputation and independence. They also find different ways to cope with their troubles. These foils enhance the importance of Hamlet’s character throughout the play.

    Read More

  • Essay On Hamlet And Fortinbras

    1112 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hamlet, Fortinbras, and Laertes have a lot in common when it comes to the situations that they find themselves in and how they initially intend to respond to those situations. Be that as it may, each of these “avenging” sons sees their situation in a different light and attempts to avenge their fathers in different fashions. The foils, similarities and differences are used by William Shakespeare to highlight the potential paths Hamlet could have taken on his crusade for revenge. Following the death of King Hamlet, Gertrude, Hamlet’s mother and Queen of Denmark, marries Claudius, the younger brother of the departed King Hamlet. Claudius addresses the haste of the wedding and claims although he is still mourning the loss of his older brother, he is overjoyed to have a new wife....

    Read More

  • An Analysis on Claudius

    634 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Hamlet, Shakespeare developed a character, an antagonist, which produces twists and turns throughout the play. Even though in the beginning of the play, Claudius seemed to be an intelligent man, who has excellent speaking skills that helped him take the leadership of his deceased brother’s kingdom, and marry his wife. But, combining both his intelligence and excellent speaking skills, shows Claudius’s true nature: an astute, lustful conspirator. Through the different settings and situations, Claudius’s character contributes to the overall understanding of the play through psychological, biblical and philosophical methods.

    Read More

  • Moderation In Hamlet Essay

    1037 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hamlet’s love for his father is clear in his first soliloquy, when he compares his father to his uncle as “Hyperion to a satyr” (citation). By alluding to his father as a radiant sun god, Hamlet demonstrates reverence and devotion. Therefore, it is no surprise that Hamlet’s reaction to news of his father’s murder is to pity the “poor ghost” and swear to “revenge his [father’s] foul and most unnatural murder” (citation; citation). Even with this massive obligation and genuine love for his father, Hamlet is slow to act. Laertes, however, never shows any signs of caring for his father, only treating him formally as “my lord” (citation). Yet, when Laertes finds out that his father has been murdered, he takes immediate action by invading the palace to kill the person responsible. When asked to calm down, he angrily proclaims “That drop of blood that’s calm proclaims me bastard” (citation). From Laertes’s point of view, failing to avenge his father would be a personal insult to his honor and his family. Thus, while both are trapped by filial obligation, Laertes feels doubly compelled to avenge his father by his duty to his family and his reputation, making him a prisoner of fate and

    Read More

  • Hamlet Comparison Essay

    1871 Words  | 4 Pages

    William Shakespeare’s play Hamlet strikes many literary chords and themes. It primarily chronicles a quest for revenge, political intrigue and a slow descent into madness. Throughout the play, two men of different rank and intellect; Hamlet and Laertes are portrayed in this play as each other’s foils. Hamlet, who has lost his father in the hands of his uncle, and Laertes, who has lost his father in the hands of Hamlet, seek out similar goals but in very distinct ways. Hamlet and Laertes both go through stages of their carving vengeance to finally fulfill their goals of killing their fathers’ murderers.

    Read More

  • Free Hamlet Essays: Weak and Pitiful Hamlet

    844 Words  | 2 Pages

    Hamlet’s sanity began to deteriorate when learned that his father’s death was not an accident, but rather a foul deed committed by the newly crowned King of Denmark. “If thou didst ever thy dear father love – Revenge his foul and most unnatural murder” [Act I, v l .23-25]. As a mysterious ghost appeared in the terrace, Hamlet learned of a murderer that would prove his fealty towards his father. As he contemplated the appalling news recently brought to his attention, the control Hamlet had over his actions was questioned. “O villain, villain, smiling, damned villain! My tables meet it is I set it down, That one may smile, and smile, and be a villain. At least I am sure it may be so in Denmark,” [Act I, v l. 106-109]. Hamlet’s hatred toward his father’s killer caused him to relate the tribulations between murder and the aspects of Denmark as a country together. As with most of the conflicts Hamlet faced, his lack of ability to avenge his father’s death, furthered the deterioration of his life and surroundings.

    Read More

  • Equilibrium Of The Mind In Hamlet

    1259 Words  | 3 Pages

    The decisions of Hamlet, Laertes, and Fortinbras are utilized to show the importance of balancing thought with action in William Shakespeare’s Hamlet. The lives of the three characters are all following similar paths at the start of the play, but their personalities take them in very different directions. For Hamlet, the idea of revenge consumes him, and he becomes too obsessive to accomplish much of anything. Laertes on the other hand jumps into the pit of revenge too quickly, and gets lost in all the hubbub. However, Fortinbras knows how to carefully dance around the subject of revenge in a manner that he succeeds with little to no damage to himself. Although it is important to act quickly in tense situations, it is also important to not ponder so much that the opportunity is lost.

    Read More

  • Shakespeare's Hamlet - Regarding Gertrude

    1957 Words  | 4 Pages

    With Queen Gertrude and finally also Laertes deeply involved in a situation of increasing ugliness, it becomes clear that, although Claudius and those who associate with him are not the incarnations of evil that Hamlet sees in them, they are corrupt enough from any balanced point of view, a condition that is also intimated by the “heavy-headed revel” that distinguishes life at the Danish court. (123)

    Read More

  • Corruption In Brenagh's Hamlet

    554 Words  | 2 Pages

    Shakespeare’s ‘Hamlet’ remains widely acknowledged centuries after the play was published during the early seventeenth century, mainly because of the many intricacies Shakespeare expertly weaves into his plot. As the play’s protagonist, Hamlet’s complex character and the emotions he experiences in his traumatic circumstances create a thrilling storyline that has entertained audiences throughout the ages. As the readers traverse further into the depth of the story, they realize that Hamlet is ceaselessly at war with himself over a seemingly trivial matter in the midst of corruption and murder: morality. One of Hamlet’s dominant traits is his compulsive need to play the role of the moral idealist.This trait is very prominent in ‘The Closet Scene’ (Act 3 Scene 4) where Hamlet stabs Polonius. His ethics have successfully postponed the attainment of his ultimate goals time and time again in Shakespeare’s theatrical piece. This tragedy has been made into a plethora of movie adaptations, all of which depict a single literary

    Read More

  • Psychological Manipulation in Hamlet by William Shakespeare

    1320 Words  | 3 Pages

    ... the only way to honour his father Polonius is by killing Hamlet. In addition, as Claudius reads the letter from Hamlet to Laertes he says “'Tis Hamlet’s character. “Naked” And in a postscript here, he says “alone.” Can you advise me?” (IV, VII, 52-53). This shows that Claudius takes advantage of Hamlet’s return alone as an opportunity for Laertes to kill him. Through Claudius’s actions the readers observe how he deceives Laertes into killing Hamlet for his own benefit without getting blood on his hands. Furthermore, Claudius’ desperation to kill Hamlet leads to him losing sight of what is important, which is being the king of Denmark, what he originally wanted, instead the lies he told and the manipulation he spread is now taking over. To conclude, it is evident through the play that the words and actions of Claudius have only lead to the spread of deception.

    Read More

  • Hamlet, Laertes & Fortinbras: Avenging Their Fathers

    1329 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the play Hamlet by William Shakespeare, the theme of revenge is very palpable as the reader examines the characters of Hamlet himself, as well as Laertes, son of Polonius, and Fortinbras, prince of Norway and son of the late King Fortinbras. Each of these young characters felt the need to avenge the deaths of their fathers who they felt were untimely killed at the bloody hands of their murderers. However, the way each chose to go about this varies greatly and gives insight into their characters and how they progress throughout the play.

    Read More

  • King Claudius: The Villain In William Shakespeare’s Hamlet

    684 Words  | 2 Pages

    In William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, revenge is a common theme throughout the play. Almost every major male character in the play, whether it is Prince Hamlet, Laertes, the Ghost of King Hamlet, or King Fortinbras of Norway, is acting with purpose to avenge a death. The obvious exception to this trend in the play is Claudius, King of Denmark and brother of King Hamlet. Instead of possessing a noble or vengeful purpose throughout the play, Claudius is instead motivated by more evil qualities like his greed and deceptive natures. But despite his solidified role as the antagonist to Prince Hamlet, Claudius’ degree of true villainy is more so in question. Claudius shows traits that stray from traditional idea of a heartless, animal-like villain working for evil, while also representing villainous qualities of the foulest kinds that ultimately overpower his humane soul. This complexity in Claudius’ character helps Shakespeare transcend the traditional villain.

    Read More

  • Hamlet's Fatal Flaw

    783 Words  | 2 Pages

    Hamlet is a scholar, speaker, actor, and prince. For some reason, Hamlet is not able to avenge his father's death without considerable delay. There is one major flaw in Hamlet's character which causes him to postpone the murder of Claudius. I believe that this flaw is Hamlet's idealism. While his idealism is a good trait, in this case, Hamlet's environment and his...

    Read More

  • Christianity in Shakespear's Hamlet

    1137 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...ith moral problems of deep import; recognition of this fact is essential to an understanding of the tragedy.” (Sister Joseph 125) Most every character in the play, whether good or evil, has Christian thought. Hamlet’s decision not to kill Claudius until he knows he will be destined to live in hell, is the main turning point of the play. His fulfillment of his father’s ghost command is the condemnation. Hamlet is a Christian prince whose sense of Christian morals drives his motives in this timeless play by William Shakespeare.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Hamlet As A Tragedy

    1178 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout the events of this play, Hamlet, the protagonist, finds himself amidst a quandary. Because of Hamlet’s philosophical and contemplative nature, he remains in a constant state of distress, which the audience perceives sporadically throughout the play as Hamlet expresses his feelings concerning the events taking place. He becomes further confused in his efforts as he continues to contemplate the consequences of his decisions. Hamlet’s main expressions of his emotionally torn state are made known primarily through his renowned soliloquies. In his famous “to be or not to be” speech, Hamlet contemplates death and discusses how, in his eyes, death may prove to have relieving qualities in that if he commits suicide, he will no longer have to worry about making his decision. Hamlet appears to be the character most concerned with reality, but seems to be the least tied to it, due to this, he is left in a state of sheer mental distress that only he can get himself out of. As the events of the play progress the audience perceives that Hamlet develops an inward struggle as he attempts to decide whether or not to avenge his father’s death by killing his murderer, Claudius. His continuous awareness and doubt delays him from acting. To highlight Hamlet’s inability to take action, Shakespeare includes a number of other characters capable of taking resolute and headstrong revenge as required. In one instance Fortinbras travels many miles to take his revenge and ultimately triumphs in conquering Denmark. In another instance, Laertes schemes to assassinate Hamlet as an act of avenging the death of his father, Polonius. Hamlet finally acts to kill Claudius, his fathers’ murderer, only after realizing that he himself is poisoned. By procrastinating, everyone whom he ridicules and targets also dies along the way. Rene` Girard’s comments on Hamlet’s

    Read More

More about Analysis Of Denying Humanity In Pursuit Of Revenge

Open Document