Analysis Of Breaking The Slump

1861 Words4 Pages

Baseball has been a fixture in America’s past from the early days and one may say is it is America’s pastime. Charles Alexander writes the book, Breaking the Slump: Baseball in the Great Depression Era with that in mind. Alexander has compiled a book about what baseball was like during the years when America lived in a time of great poverty and economic troubles. Alexander writes with the aim of writing a chronology of baseball and how it the happenings of the world influenced this sport. Baseball has had a great following and Alexander explains the National pastime in a way that feels like you are right there during the season. Alexander’s style, source base, and focus make this book a great history of the time. He does miss a few things that …show more content…

Thyclydies and Herodotus were the two definers in the early histories on how histories are normally written. Herodotus is more a narrative type writer and likes to write to appeal to the writer’s feelings. Thyclides who is more of a writer like Alexander writes analytical. He looks how people write to explain how people did things other than supernatural forces. Alexander is an analytical when he looks at things season by season. He also is analytical by including all the facts and data to back up his points. Being an analytical writer helps Alexander establish his …show more content…

Alexander builds an admirable amount of sources, writes in a way that takes the reader season by season, and uses visual histories to help enhance his writings. The flaws a reader may see in his writing is forgetting to look at the culture that influenced the players and leaving out Negro baseball. Baseball has been a fixture in American culture for many years and as a historian Alexander encompasses baseball during the Depression in a way that makes it come alive for the

Open Document